We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Insight into the absorption and migration of polystyrene nanoplastics in Eichhornia crassipes and related photosynthetic responses
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied how water hyacinth plants absorb and transport polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes. Smaller nanoplastics (20 nm) penetrated deeper into root tissue and migrated to leaves, while larger ones (200 nm) mostly stayed in the roots. Both sizes impaired photosynthesis, suggesting that nanoplastic pollution in waterways can harm aquatic plants that play important roles in water purification.
Nanoplastics, as emerging contaminants are being released into aquatic environments with their increasing applications, and induce potential hazards to aquatic ecosystem. In this work, we investigated the removal process of polystyrene nanoparticles (PS NPs) by Eichhornia crassipes and the related photosynthetic responses of E. crassipes. Results showed that both sizes of PS NPs (20 and 200 nm) with 50 mg/L induced the prominent damage on the root epidermis after 48 h exposure, and smaller size PS NPs caused the greater damage. PS NPs has been entered the roots of E. crassipes and migrated from the epidermis, cortex, to vascular system by using confocal laser scanning microscopy observation. Scanning electron microscope images confirmed the distribution of PS NPs (200 nm) in the roots. The crack at sites of primary-lateral root junction was an important way for the uptake of PS NPs, which destroyed the defense of Casparian strip, and promoted the migration of PS NPs into the vascular system. PS NPs entered the submerged leaves by stomata and the intercellular spaces of lower epidermis. Moreover, PS NPs in the plants showed significant inhibition on net photosynthetic rate, intercellular CO concentration, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. This study concluded the absorption and migration processes of PS NPs by E. crassipes, and the negative effects on photosynthesis, which will be useful for guiding the floating plants application for PS NPs removal in aqueous environment and ecological improvement.
More Papers Like This
Tracing and trapping micro- and nanoplastics: Untapped mitigation potential of aquatic plants?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used fluorescently labeled polystyrene particles to trace microplastic and nanoplastic uptake in three aquatic plant species, finding that nanoplastics concentrated primarily in roots via apoplastic transport with bioconcentration factors up to 306, suggesting floating plants like water hyacinth may be useful for removing plastic from contaminated water.
The threat of micro/nanoplastic to aquatic plants: current knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes what is known about how micro- and nanoplastics affect aquatic plants, including how plants absorb these particles through roots and leaves and transport them internally. Exposure can alter plant growth, photosynthesis, and interactions with other organisms, though effects vary widely depending on plastic type and concentration. The authors highlight major research gaps and call for more studies on real-world conditions rather than controlled lab settings.
Trade-off of abiotic stress response in floating macrophytes as affected by nanoplastic enrichment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed water hyacinth plants to polystyrene nanoplastics at varying concentrations for 28 days. They found that while the plants removed 61-91% of nanoplastics from the water, the particles reduced plant biomass, impaired photosynthesis, and caused oxidative stress in roots and leaves. The study suggests that floating plants in constructed wetlands can help filter nanoplastics but experience significant physiological trade-offs in the process.
Transport Dynamicsand Physiological Responses ofPolystyrene Nanoplastics in Pakchoi: Implications for Food Safetyand Environmental Health
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked the transport and physiological responses of polystyrene nanoplastics in pakchoi (bok choy) plants, finding that nanoplastics were absorbed through roots and translocated to shoots where they disrupted chlorophyll production and reduced plant growth.
Physiological Responses and Absorption Removal Effects of Three Floating Macrophytes to Polystyrene Nanoplastics Pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) harm floating water plants, damaging their cells and forcing them to work harder to survive. Some plant species also absorbed and stored more plastic than others. This matters because these plants grow in waterways that can feed into our water supply, so understanding how they interact with plastic pollution helps researchers figure out how nanoplastics move through ecosystems, and potentially toward us.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.