0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Comparison of microbial colonization between natural and plastic substrata in a polluted watershed

FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2023 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Louis Carles, Lucie Laffet, Lucie Laffet, Muriel Joly, Louis Carles, Louis Carles, Florence Donnadieu-Bernard, Florence Donnadieu-Bernard, Anna M. Romaní, Joan Artigas

Summary

Researchers compared microbial colonization of biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastics with natural substrata (leaves, sediment, rocks) in an urbanized watershed, finding that microbial density and enzymatic activity were generally higher on natural substrata and that plastic contamination level at each site influenced community composition.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic pollution represents a threat for biological communities and the ecological functions they provide in river ecosystems. In this study, we compared the microbial colonization of two plastics (biodegradable and non-biodegradable) and three natural substrata (leaves, sediment, and rocks) in two study sites of an urbanized watershed differing in their plastic-contamination degree (upstream and downstream). The density and diversity of bacterial, fungal, and algal communities, as well as the extracellular enzymatic activities β-glucosidase (GLU), N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), and phosphatase (PHO), were analysed in each substrata and site over a 4-week colonization experiment. Results showed higher microbial densities and enzymatic activities in leaves and sediment compared to plastics and rocks, probably due to the greater availability of organic carbon and nutrients in the former substrata. However, the microbial colonization of the two plastics was only different in the downstream site, where bacterial density and enzymatic activities were higher in the biodegradable plastic compared to the non-biodegradable plastic. Accordingly, the presence of biodegradable plastics would enhance the heterotrophic metabolism in plastic-polluted rivers.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper