We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparison of microbial colonization between natural and plastic substrata in a polluted watershed
Summary
Researchers compared microbial colonization of biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastics with natural substrata (leaves, sediment, rocks) in an urbanized watershed, finding that microbial density and enzymatic activity were generally higher on natural substrata and that plastic contamination level at each site influenced community composition.
Plastic pollution represents a threat for biological communities and the ecological functions they provide in river ecosystems. In this study, we compared the microbial colonization of two plastics (biodegradable and non-biodegradable) and three natural substrata (leaves, sediment, and rocks) in two study sites of an urbanized watershed differing in their plastic-contamination degree (upstream and downstream). The density and diversity of bacterial, fungal, and algal communities, as well as the extracellular enzymatic activities β-glucosidase (GLU), N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), and phosphatase (PHO), were analysed in each substrata and site over a 4-week colonization experiment. Results showed higher microbial densities and enzymatic activities in leaves and sediment compared to plastics and rocks, probably due to the greater availability of organic carbon and nutrients in the former substrata. However, the microbial colonization of the two plastics was only different in the downstream site, where bacterial density and enzymatic activities were higher in the biodegradable plastic compared to the non-biodegradable plastic. Accordingly, the presence of biodegradable plastics would enhance the heterotrophic metabolism in plastic-polluted rivers.
Sign in to start a discussion.