0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

AreMicroplastic(∼25–1000 μm)and Plasticizer Concentrations Correlated in Sediments of an UrbanizedUK Estuary?

Figshare 2025
Alex Billings (22785022), Richard K. Cross (6713132), Francis Daunt (264478), Justyna P. Olszewska (22785025), Amy Pickard (22138101), Maria I. Bogdanova (18826601), Ruairidh Cox (22785028), Kevin C. Jones (1373991), David J. Spurgeon (488746), M. Glória Pereira (1862476)

Summary

Researchers investigated the co-occurrence of microplastics and plasticizers in sediments of the urbanized Forth estuary in Scotland, finding no spatial correlation between microplastic concentrations and plasticizer levels at individual sites, suggesting that microplastics in the 25-1000 µm size range are not reliable predictors of plasticizer distribution in estuarine environments.

An understanding of the relationships between plastics and plasticizers is vital in order to assess their environmental risk. We investigated spatial trends and relationships between microplastics and plasticizers in sediments of an urbanized estuary subject to contemporary and historic sources of contamination (Forth estuary, Scotland, UK). As such, this study represents one of the first to investigate the co-occurrence of emerging plasticizers, phthalates, and microplastics in an estuary system. We determined the concentration of 7 legacy (phthalate) and 3 emerging (adipate, terephthalate, trimellitate) plasticizers and 21 microplastic polymer types. The most abundant microplastics were polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), and poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC). Plasticizers were dominated by diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), although emerging plasticizers (e.g., diethylhexyl terephthalate, DEHTP) were frequently detected at low concentrations (mean 7.3 ng g–1 ww). There was strong evidence that concentrations of microplastics and plasticizers were significantly lower in the outer estuary. However, we found no evidence for a spatial relationship between the concentration of microplastics and plasticizers at individual site level. Our results indicate that microplastics in the size range analyzed (∼25–1000 μm) may not be a good predictor of the spatial distribution of plasticizers in estuaries. This could result from release of plasticizers prior to plastic fragmentation and deposition and differences in transport and fate.

Share this paper