We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Rice yield and carbon dioxide emissions in a paddy soil: A comparison of biochar and polystyrene microplastics
Summary
Researchers compared the effects of biochar and polystyrene microplastics on rice growth and carbon dioxide emissions in paddy soil. Both materials increased CO2 emissions, but biochar improved rice yield while microplastics did not provide the same benefits. The study suggests that microplastic accumulation in rice paddies could worsen greenhouse gas emissions without the soil-improvement benefits that biochar offers.
Abstract Biochar has been suggested as a soil supplement to improve soil fertility. The world is covered in microplastics (MPs). A pot greenhouse experiment was carried out to examine the effects of polystyrene (PS), sugarcane bagasse biochar (SBB), and their interactions (PS × SBB) on the CO 2 emission and rice yield in a rice paddy calcareous soil. The largest CO 2 emissions occurred 35–40 days following rice planting, which corresponds to the tillering stages of rice growth. Higher CO 2 emissions were detected after SBB treatment. Our findings showed that applying PS increased CO 2 emissions in our soil samples. Our research revealed that adding SBB can boosted the negative effects of PS in the soil. The co‐application of SBB and PS increased PS's stimulation of the CO 2 emissions. We infer that PS‐SBB interactions have an impact on global warming potential, microbial community activity, and CO 2 emissions. Both SBB rates resulted in a significant increase in biomass and rice grain. Our research indicates that PS has a detrimental effect on rice grain output and biomass, but that the addition of SBB can slightly lessen these effects.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Influence of polyethylene terephthalate microplastic and biochar co-existence on paddy soil bacterial community structure and greenhouse gas emission
Researchers studied how polyethylene terephthalate microplastics and biochar, both common in agricultural soils, affect soil bacteria and greenhouse gas emissions during rice cultivation. They found that microplastics alone reduced bacterial diversity, but adding biochar alongside the microplastics partially restored microbial communities and altered gas emissions. The study suggests that biochar may help mitigate some of the negative soil health effects of microplastic contamination in paddy fields.
Environmental risk of microplastics after field aging: Reduced rice yield without mitigating yield-scale ammonia volatilization from paddy soils
Researchers conducted field aging experiments with polystyrene and polyethylene microplastics and biochar in paddy soils, finding that field-aged microplastics reduced rice yield without mitigating ammonia volatilization, indicating that aged microplastics pose ongoing environmental risks to paddy ecosystem nitrogen cycling and crop production.
Low-density polyethylene microplastics and biochar interactively affect greenhouse gas emissions and microbial community structure and function in paddy soil
Researchers examined how low-density polyethylene microplastics and biochar interact when added to paddy soil, affecting greenhouse gas emissions and microbial communities. The study found that both amendments significantly increased methane emissions while suppressing carbon dioxide output, and their combined presence altered soil microbial community structure and functional gene abundances in ways that influence biogeochemical processes.
Elevated CO2 aggravated polystyrene microplastics effects on the rice-soil system under field conditions
Researchers found that elevated CO2 concentrations aggravate the negative effects of polystyrene microplastics on rice growth and soil bacterial communities under field conditions, suggesting that climate change may worsen microplastic impacts on agriculture.
Polyethylene microplastic and biochar interactively affect the global warming potential of soil greenhouse gas emissions
A 45-day laboratory incubation experiment tested polyethylene microplastics and two types of biochar applied to agricultural soil alone and in combination, measuring effects on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial communities. Co-application of microplastic and biochar reduced the global warming potential of cumulative greenhouse gas emissions compared to microplastic alone, suggesting biochar partially mitigates microplastic effects on soil carbon cycling.