0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Use of Ultrafiltration Membranes as Tertiary/Quaternary Treatment for Wastewater Reclamation in Municipal WWTPs

Water 2025
Á. Sabina Acebrón, Julio Revert-Vercher, Pau Sanchis-Perucho, L. Borrás, A. Seco

Summary

Researchers assessed ultrafiltration membranes as tertiary and quaternary municipal wastewater treatment, demonstrating that optimized operating conditions including increased air sparging intensity, elevated solids concentration, and regular acid backwashing minimized fouling and produced permeate meeting the EU's most stringent Class A agricultural reuse standards while effectively removing microplastics.

Study Type Environmental

This work assesses the viability of ultrafiltration (UF) membranes as a substitution for classic tertiary technologies for municipal wastewater (MWW) treatment. UF membranes can offer efficient MWW filtration, meeting quality standards regarding solids, bacteria, viruses and emerging pollutants, such as microplastics. All of these make UF not only an attractive competitor regarding tertiary treatments but also a potential quaternary treatment according to the latest legislation. Indeed, the achieved permeate quality meets the more stringent parameters for water reuse in agriculture according to the European standard (A-type water). The UF membrane’s feasibility when used as an MWW tertiary/quaternary treatment was assessed in a semi-industrial plant with commercially available industrial membrane modules under different operating conditions: (1) transmembrane flux, (2) air sparging intensity and filtration/relaxation periodicities, (3) the concentration of solids reached in the membrane tank and (4) the efficacy of chemically enhanced backwashing (CEB) to mitigate fouling. Increasing the air intensity (around 0.25 m3 m−2 h−1), increasing the solids concentration (3–4 g L−1) and using acid chemicals for backwashing at low concentrations but high periodicities (about 25–50 ppm of HCl/citric acid at a pH of 2.5 once or twice every 15 days) displayed great effectiveness in minimizing fouling, which was found to be mainly reversible. Thanks to the stablished conditions, semi-industrial UF membrane filtration was possible for more than 30 days when operating at relatively high transmembrane fluxes (21.5 LMH), achieving an average transmembrane pressure of around 120 mbar with an extremely low fouling growth rate of 0.024 mbar d−1.

Share this paper