0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Exposure to micro- and nanoplastics and human reproductive outcomes: a systematic review

2023 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kathryn Hunt, Kathryn Hunt, Anna Davies, Anna Davies, Abigail Fraser, Abigail Fraser, Christy Burden, Christy Burden, Amy Howell, Amy Howell, Amy Howell, Amy Howell, Kirsten Buckley, Kirsten Buckley, Kirsten Buckley, Kirsten Buckley, Sam Harding, Sam Harding, Danya Bakhbakhi Danya Bakhbakhi

Summary

This systematic review summarizes existing research on whether micro and nanoplastics affect human fertility and pregnancy outcomes. While the evidence is still emerging, the review found that these particles have been detected in placenta and fetal tissue, raising important questions about potential effects on reproductive health that warrant further study.

Body Systems
Models
Study Type Review

Background: Micro- and nanoplastics are novel pollutants which have been detected in human tissues including placenta and fetal meconium. However, their association with adverse fertility or pregnancy outcomes in humans is not known. Objectives: To synthesise evidence for the presence of micro- and nanoplastics in human reproductive tissue and their associations with environmental exposures and reproductive outcomes. Search Strategy: Medline, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched from inception to 03/02/2023. Selection Criteria: Studies of human participants, assessing presence of micro- and nanoplastics in reproductive tissues, environmental exposures to micro- and nanoplastics, and fertility or pregnancy-related outcomes. Data Collection and Analysis: Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, microplastics detected, environmental exposures, reproductive outcomes, and risk of bias. Narrative synthesis was performed due to methodological heterogeneity. Main Results: Of 1094 citations, seven studies were included, covering 96 participants. Microplastics were detected in 68 out of 96 placentas examined across all studies, and in all 14 meconium samples. Two studies reported associations between lifestyle factors (daily water intake, use of scrub cleanser or toothpaste, bottled water and takeaway food) and placental microplastics. One study reported associations between meconium microplastics and microbiota diversity and composition. One reported placental microplastics levels correlated with reduced birth weights and 1-minute Apgar scores. All studies had a very high risk of bias. Conclusions: There is a need for high-quality observational studies to assess the effects of microplastics on human reproductive health. Funding: None received Keywords: microplastics, nanoplastics, pregnancy, fertility, environmental pollution

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper