We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Integrated Ecological Risk Assessment of the Agricultural Area under a High Anthropopressure Based on Chemical, Ecotoxicological and Ecological Indicators
Summary
Researchers conducted an integrated ecological risk assessment of agricultural land using chemical, ecotoxicological, and ecological indicators, finding that while chemical analysis overestimated risk, the combined approach revealed most of the area had acceptable risk levels despite over a century of anthropogenic pressure.
Agricultural land is often located close to highly urbanised/industrialised areas and is subject to continuous anthropogenic pressure associated with the emission of many pollutants, ultimately deposited in the soil. Most studies on ecological risk assessment have only analysed the total contaminants’ concentration, which does not reflect their bioavailability or toxicity and often leads to an overestimation of risk. Therefore, in our study, we used an interdisciplinary approach, whereby the final conclusions about the risk in a given area are based on the integration of detailed data from chemical, ecotoxicological and ecological analysis. The research was carried out on agricultural land exposed to high levels of anthropopression for more than 100 years. Chemical measurements comprised both the total and bioavailable PAH content. A battery of bio-assays describing effects on soil retention and habitat function was used for ecotoxicity testing, and ecological indicators included enzymatic activity, respiration, microbial biomass, carbon mineralisation and nitrification. The integrated IntRisk index ranged from 0.19 to 0.94, and this was mainly due to high values of the chemical risk index, while the ecotoxicological and ecological results indicated no or low risk. The majority of the area (almost 90%) had acceptable risk levels, no/low risk (IntRisk < 0.5) at 57% of the sites and medium risk at 28% of the area. Very high unacceptable risk (IntRisk 0.77–0.94) was only at three sampling sites. The integration of data from a set of 15 indicators allowed us to derive quantitative risk indexes and delineate the limited area which needs additional action.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Biosecurity of agroecosystems under technogenic and environmental risks
Ukrainian researchers developed an interdisciplinary monitoring framework combining ecotoxicological analysis, biogeochemical modeling, and digital technologies to assess how technogenic and environmental risks interact to threaten agroecosystem biosecurity.
An alternative approach to risk rank chemicals on the threat they pose to the aquatic environment
This paper proposed an alternative approach for ranking chemicals by the threat they pose to aquatic ecosystems, integrating exposure and hazard data in a more ecologically meaningful way than standard risk quotient methods.
State of the Art of Triad-Based Ecological Risk Assessment: Current Limitations and Needed Implementations in the Case of Soil Diffuse Contamination
This review examines the triad approach for ecological risk assessment in soils facing diffuse contamination, synthesizing the literature on its applications to terrestrial ecosystems and identifying current limitations when dealing with chronic low-level mixtures of micropollutants. The authors recommend improvements to the triad methodology to better address complex, real-world soil contamination scenarios.
Chemical Mixtures and Multiple Stressors: Same but Different?
This review highlights the parallels between chemical mixture research and multiple stressor ecology, arguing that both fields face similar challenges in predicting joint effects and would benefit from integrated frameworks combining chemical and non-chemical stressor assessments.
Ecotoxicological and Chemical Approach to Assessing Environmental Effects from Pesticide Use in Organic and Conventional Rice Paddies
Researchers evaluated the environmental impact of plant protection products in seven conventional and organic rice paddies in northern Italy over two years using integrated chemical analysis and ecotoxicological hazard assessment supported by statistical tools. They found a direct relationship between the presence of the herbicide Oxadiazon in water samples and ecotoxicological bioassay responses, demonstrating that the integrated approach better captures environmental risk than traditional tabular evaluation methods.