0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

A Critical Review of Polystyrene Microplastics in Soil–Plant Systems: Absorption, Phytotoxicity and Future Perspectives

Land Degradation and Development 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Babar Iqbal, Guanlin Li, Tingting Zhao, Babar Iqbal, Guanlin Li, Guanlin Li, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Ali Raza Khan, Babar Iqbal, Ali Raza Khan, Ali Raza Khan, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Junmin Li, Daolin Du Guanlin Li, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Daolin Du Ali Raza Khan, Junmin Li, Daolin Du, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Daolin Du Guanlin Li, Babar Iqbal, Junmin Li, Wardah Azhar, Babar Iqbal, Ali Raza Khan, Wardah Azhar, Tingting Zhao, Abdus Salam, Guanlin Li, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Daolin Du Abdus Salam, Abdus Salam, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Wardah Azhar, Wardah Azhar, Babar Iqbal, Syed Hassan Raza Zaidi, Babar Iqbal, Babar Iqbal, Tingting Zhao, Daolin Du, Daolin Du Daolin Du Babar Iqbal, Guanlin Li, Babar Iqbal, Guanlin Li, Daolin Du Guanlin Li, Babar Iqbal, Guanlin Li, Daolin Du

Summary

This review compiled evidence on how polystyrene microplastics behave in soil-plant systems, covering their effects on soil microbial communities, plant root uptake, and crop phytotoxicity. The authors document that PS-MPs alter soil biochemistry and enter plant tissues, raising concerns about their accumulation in the food chain.

Polymers

ABSTRACT The extensive utilisation and inadequate disposal of polystyrene microplastics (PS‐MPs) pose significant threats to soil–plant ecosystems. The present review assembles evidence concerning their behaviour and impacts within soil–plant systems. In soils, PS‐MPs alter the composition of microbial communities, elevate respiration stress, and regulate the activity of extracellular enzymes. In term of soil fauna, PS‐MPs show oxidative, genotoxic, and immunological reactions which can slow down decomposition and nutrient cycling. Plants take up PS‐MPs via root and foliar pathways, translocate them through vascular tissues, and accumulate them in metabolically active sites, with consequent inhibition of photosynthesis, hormonal imbalance, and transcriptome and metabolome reprogramming. Interactions with coexisting stressors are context‐dependent: co‐exposure to heavy metals, antibiotics, or phthalates frequently enhances reactive oxygen species formation and nutrient imbalance, whereas adsorption‐driven immobilisation by PS‐MPs can reduce pollutant bioavailability and partially mitigate toxicity. Size dependence is a consistent theme, with nano‐scale fractions showing higher mobility and intracellular access, and micro‐scale fractions exerting stronger physical and adsorptive effects in the rhizosphere. We highlight priorities for field‐realistic, long‐term studies that integrate particle ageing, multi‐stressor experiments, and harmonised exposure metrics, together with nature‐based mitigation strategies. Linking PS‐MPs indicators to soil‐health assessment and land‐degradation frameworks will support risk evaluation and sustainable management of agroecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper