0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Is the aquatic macrophyte Landoltia punctata tolerant to high concentrations of polystyrene nanoplastics?

The Science of The Total Environment 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Cristina Moreira Lalau, Carmen Simioni, Ana Letícia Rossetto, Rodrigo Costa Puerari, Cassiana Rebello de Carvalho, Luciane Cristina Ouriques, William Gerson Matias

Summary

Researchers tested whether the aquatic macrophyte Landoltia punctata can tolerate high concentrations of polystyrene nanoplastics, finding that the plant showed resilience at environmentally relevant levels but experienced measurable oxidative stress and physiological disruption at higher doses. The results suggest this floating plant has moderate tolerance but is not immune to nanoplastic toxicity.

Polymers

Nanoplastics (NPs), arising from the degradation of plastic waste, are emerging environmental contaminants with high adsorptive potential for hydrophobic pollutants. Despite their recognized risks, knowledge of their effects on living organisms under natural environments remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the adverse effects and toxicological mechanisms of polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) in the aquatic macrophyte Landoltia punctata. To this end, PSNPs were synthesized and characterized, followed by in-depth toxicological assessments. L. punctata was exposed to six concentrations of PSNPs (50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1600 mg L), and a control, under standardized conditions (ISO DIS 20079, 2005), followed by a second exposure phase using EC (682.5 mg L), LOEC (50 mg L), and the highest concentration at which growth was still observed (800 mg L). This exposure aimed to identify the factors underlying the observed effects on plant growth and to enhance understanding of plant response mechanisms. Morphological, functional, and ultrastructural modifications, alongside alterations in photosynthetic pigment profiles and oxidative stress biomarkers were analyzed, to elucidate the mechanisms underlying nanoplastic toxicity. The results demonstrated alterations in the plant's growth rate, enzymatic activity, and tissue structure, alongside evidence of PSNP adsorption and cellular internalization. Nevertheless, metabolic activity remained unaffected, allowing sustained plant development even at elevated concentrations. These findings indicate that, despite physiological and structural impacts, the organism displays resilience to PSNP exposure. Consequently, it presents promising potential for use in bioremediation strategies targeting environments contaminated by this pollutant, underscoring its significance as a biological agent for environmental restoration.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The impacts of nanoplastic toxicity on the accumulation, hormonal regulation and tolerance mechanisms in a potential hyperaccumulator - Lemna minor L.

Researchers studied the toxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on the freshwater plant Lemna minor, a species used extensively in phytoremediation. The study found that nanoplastic exposure affected plant growth and triggered hormonal responses, while also revealing tolerance mechanisms that the plant employs to cope with nanoplastic stress.

Article Tier 2

Trade-off of abiotic stress response in floating macrophytes as affected by nanoplastic enrichment

Researchers exposed water hyacinth plants to polystyrene nanoplastics at varying concentrations for 28 days. They found that while the plants removed 61-91% of nanoplastics from the water, the particles reduced plant biomass, impaired photosynthesis, and caused oxidative stress in roots and leaves. The study suggests that floating plants in constructed wetlands can help filter nanoplastics but experience significant physiological trade-offs in the process.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics inDuckweed: Single-Cell Responses andRecovery

This study examined how polystyrene nanoplastics affect duckweed at the single-cell level, documenting photosynthetic disruption and oxidative stress, as well as partial recovery after exposure ceased. The results indicate aquatic macrophytes have some resilience to nanoplastic stress but can sustain lasting cellular damage at higher doses.

Article Tier 2

Negative impacts of nanoplastics on the purification function of submerged plants in constructed wetlands: Responses of oxidative stress and metabolic processes

Researchers exposed a submerged aquatic plant commonly used in constructed wetlands to polystyrene nanoplastics and measured the impacts on growth, photosynthesis, and metabolism. They found that nanoplastics were absorbed and transported throughout the plant, reducing growth by up to 73 percent and disrupting key metabolic pathways including the citric acid cycle. The study suggests that nanoplastic accumulation in wetland plants could compromise their ability to purify water.

Article Tier 2

The impact of polystyrene nanoplastics on plants in the scenario of increasing temperatures: The case of Azolla filiculoides Lam

Researchers studied the combined effects of polystyrene nanoplastics and elevated temperatures on the aquatic fern Azolla filiculoides. They found that higher temperatures amplified the toxic effects of nanoplastics on plant growth and photosynthetic performance. The study suggests that climate change may worsen the environmental impact of nanoplastic pollution on aquatic plant communities.

Share this paper