0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Comparative Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Social Criteria for Plastic Recycling Technology Selection in India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Thailand

International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 2023 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sayaka Ono, Sayaka Ono, Sayaka Ono, Takuji W. Tsusaka Takuji W. Tsusaka

Summary

This study surveyed stakeholders in four Asian countries about criteria for selecting PET plastic recycling technologies, finding that environmental and economic factors were rated highest. Improving PET recycling capacity is critical for reducing plastic waste that ultimately becomes microplastic pollution.

Polymers

This study examines stakeholder perceptions of environmental, economic, and social indicators for selecting Polyethylene terephthalate recycling technologies in India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.An online survey was conducted with 154 stakeholders from these countries.The survey data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.The results showed that global warming potential and total energy demand were the most important environmental indicators across all countries.Capital costs and profits from main recycling businesses were of utmost importance economically.Social indicators such as working environment and job creation opportunities were also deemed significant.However, the study found differences across countries.For instance, water consumption and solid waste generation were more important for Pakistan than for Thailand, while acidification potential and photochemical oxidant formation were more important for Thailand.Moreover, electricity cost was more significant in Sri Lanka, while job creation opportunity was more important in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka than in Thailand.The findings of this study can inform decisionmaking processes for policymakers and industry leaders in the plastic recycling field, aiding them in the transition toward a circular economy.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper