We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Investigating the correlation between morphological features of microplastics (5–500 µm) and their analytical recovery
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how microplastic particles of different sizes are lost during laboratory sample processing and found that filter crowding (too many particles on a filter) was a bigger cause of loss than particle size alone. They recommend keeping particle coverage below 5% on filters and developed a spiking method using colored microplastics to more accurately measure recovery rates, especially for the smallest particles.
Abstract As a direct result of laboratory sample manipulation required to identify microplastics (MPs) within a given matrix, some MPs are inevitably lost. The extent of this loss can be quite significant and varies greatly depending on the sample matrix, choice of protocol and target MPs in question. Defining analytical MP recovery is therefore a critical component in ensuring the quality of MP protocols. The potential relationship between particle size and recovery rate has been widely discussed but remains uncertain. To determine whether MP loss correlated with particle size, three aliquots of polyethylene fragments in the 5–50 µm size range and three aliquots of polypropylene fragments in the 50–500 µm size range, were consecutively transferred back and forth from filter to liquid. After each individual transfer the analytical recovery within specified size groups, was evaluated by applying high-resolution darkfield microscopy. Average recovery across the entire size range was estimated at 80% with a standard deviation (std. dev.) of 26%. Notably, particle coverage on filters (A%) showed a more significant impact on recovery than particle size. Maintaining A% below 5% on filters for microscopic analysis is advised to prevent excessive loss due to particle agglomeration. To determine whether the use of red polyethylene fragments in the 5–50 µm size range in combination with darkfield microscopy could potentially improve MP recovery evaluation in environmental samples, three aliquots of 0.5 g of dry brown trout muscle tissue were spiked and treated according to a relevant protocol. This size-discriminating approach accurately determined average recovery at 52% with a std. dev. of 4% and demonstrated the potential for correction of the concentration enhancement of smaller MPs resulting from particle breakup during sample pre-treatment, which would otherwise lead to overestimation of smaller size fractions.
More Papers Like This
Correction: Investigating the correlation between morphological features of microplastics (5–500 µm) and their analytical recovery
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how the shape and size characteristics of microplastic particles (ranging from 5 to 500 micrometers) affect how reliably they can be detected and counted during laboratory analysis, with findings that help improve measurement accuracy for environmental monitoring of plastic pollution.
Determining the appropriate number of particles on a filter to allow small microplastics to be analyzed by microscopy
AI summary Read the abstract
This study investigated how many particles can be placed on a filter before overlapping particles cause errors in microplastic counting and sizing by microscopy. The findings provide practical guidance for laboratory protocols to ensure accurate microplastic measurements in environmental samples.
Comparative evaluation of filtration and imaging properties of analytical filters for microplastic capture and analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared five analytical filter types for microplastic capture and analysis, evaluating their filtration efficiency and imaging properties to help standardize methods and improve the reliability of microplastic quantification across laboratories.
Microplastic quantification affected by structure and pore size of filters
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers demonstrated that the structure and pore size of filters used in microplastic research significantly affect quantification outcomes, finding that nylon double-layer-hole filters retained nearly all large microplastics while depth-filtration filters showed variable capture rates depending on particle size. The study highlights that filter choice is a critical methodological variable that can lead to inconsistent microplastic concentration estimates across studies.
The importance of integrating morphological attributes of microplastics: a theoretical discussion to assess environmental impacts
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used a theoretical approach to argue that reporting microplastic results solely as particle counts — without accounting for morphological attributes such as size, volume, mass, or specific surface area — leads to significant misrepresentation of environmental impact when comparing supposedly equivalent samples.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.