0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Adsorption of As(III) by microplastics coexisting with antibiotics

The Science of The Total Environment 2023 48 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xiaoxiao Zhang, Tian Xia, Wenlong Song, Bing Ma, Mengxin Chen, Yiming Sun, Yan Chen, Lei Zhang

Summary

This study examined how microplastics absorb arsenic, a toxic metal, from water, especially when antibiotics are also present. Smaller and more aged microplastic particles absorbed more arsenic, and environmental factors like pH and dissolved organic matter significantly changed absorption rates. This is relevant to human health because microplastics in contaminated water can concentrate toxic metals like arsenic on their surface and potentially carry them into drinking water or the food chain.

Polymers

Although recent studies have been conducted on the pollution and toxicity of microplastics with heavy metals or antibiotics, it is necessary to further investigate the coexistence of antibiotics and heavy metals on the surface of microplastics. In this study, the mechanisms of As(III) adsorption by polystyrene (PS) and polyamide (PA) microplastics in the presence of antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, CIP) were investigated. Adsorption behavior was investigated using kinetic and isotherm models, and the effects of microplastic particle size, aging, ion concentration, pH, xanthic acid (FA), and tannic acid (TA) were considered. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm models showed that the kinetics of As(III) adsorption on PS were consistent with a pseudo-first-order model; the kinetics of adsorption on PA were more consistent with segmented linear regression. The Freundlich model is consistent with the adsorption isotherms of As(III) on PS and PA. The smaller the microplastic particle size and the longer the aging time, the better the adsorption of As(III). Increasing NOsignificantly inhibited the adsorption of As(III) by PS, while it first promoted and then inhibited the adsorption by PA. The effect of pH was similar to that ofNO. The adsorption of As(III) by PS was significantly promoted by FA and TA, regardless of the presence of CIP; the adsorption of As(III) by PA was inhibited. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize microscopic morphology of pristine and aged PS and PA microplastics; Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XPS) revealed changes in surface functional groups of PS and PA, while demonstrating the importance of different functional groups in exogenous additives (CIP and dissolved organic matter, DOM) in the adsorption of As(III). This study provides new insight into adsorption behaviors and interaction mechanisms between ternary pollutants.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

[Adsorption Characteristics of Arsenic on UV-aged Polypropylene Microplastics in Aqueous Solution].

This study examined how UV weathering (aging) changes the ability of polypropylene microplastics to adsorb arsenic from water, finding that aged plastic had rougher surfaces and more oxygen-containing groups, which enhanced arsenic adsorption. Environmental factors like pH and dissolved organic matter also influenced how much arsenic stuck to the plastic. Because aged microplastics bind more arsenic, they could carry this toxic heavy metal into aquatic food webs more effectively than pristine plastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Impact of Microplastics on the Fate and Behaviour of Arsenic in the Environment and Their Significance for Drinking Water Supply

This review highlights a largely overlooked problem: microplastics in the environment can adsorb arsenic — one of the world's most dangerous water contaminants — onto their surfaces and potentially transport it to new locations or make it harder to remove during drinking water treatment. The authors call for urgent research into how the presence of microplastics affects the performance of arsenic removal technologies, since both pollutants now co-occur in water sources globally.

Article Tier 2

Effect and mechanism of coexistence of microplastics on arsenate adsorption capacity in water

Researchers examined how the presence of microplastics affects the ability of different materials to adsorb arsenate from contaminated water. They found that microplastics can interfere with the adsorption process, particularly by competing for binding sites on adsorbent materials like ZIF-8. The study highlights that co-contamination of water with both microplastics and heavy metals may complicate pollution remediation efforts.

Article Tier 2

Interface adsorption characteristics of microplastics on multiple morphological arsenic compounds

Researchers studied how polystyrene and PET microplastics adsorb different forms of arsenic, a toxic element commonly found in contaminated water. They found that polystyrene had a much higher capacity to bind arsenic compounds than PET, and that the arsenic-loaded microplastics were more toxic to organisms than either pollutant alone. The study highlights that microplastics can act as carriers for toxic heavy metals, amplifying their environmental harm.

Article Tier 2

Adsorption of arsenite to polystyrene microplastics in the presence of humus

Polystyrene microplastics adsorb arsenic more effectively when humic acid is present in the water, because the organic matter forms a coating on the plastic surface that attracts more arsenic ions. This finding suggests that microplastics can serve as vectors for the toxic metalloid arsenic in natural water environments.

Share this paper