0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Impact of Nanoplastic Contamination on Rhizosphere Microbiome and Plant Phenotype

2023 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yang Yang, Leilei Zhang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Leilei Zhang, Leilei Zhang, Leilei Zhang, Leilei Zhang, Leilei Zhang, Yang Yang, Leilei Zhang, Henrique Petry Feiler, Leilei Zhang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Sara Norato, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Leilei Zhang, Leilei Zhang, Leilei Zhang, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini, Yang Yang, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini Leilei Zhang, Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Sungchan Oh, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini Yang Yang, Lori Hogland, Luigi Lucini, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Yang Yang, Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini Luigi Lucini, Luigi Lucini

Summary

This study examined how nanoplastic contamination affects the rhizosphere microbiome (soil bacteria around plant roots) and plant growth. Nanoplastic exposure altered soil microbial communities and reduced plant growth, suggesting these tiny plastic particles could disrupt the soil ecosystems that support food production.

Nanoplastic (NP) is an organic contaminant that is widespread in soil, water, and food. However, the effects of NP are not well understood, especially in the context of the rhizosphere-roots-microbiome interface and how they can impact both plants and the soil microbiome. Our hypothesis is that the presence of NP in the soil will lead to distinct changes in the root microbiome and result in a unique phenotype in the plant. To investigate this, we conducted an experiment in which two crops, tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-tom) and lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. cv Canasta), were planted in three different soil conditions: a control group with no NP (zero-NP) and two experimental groups with NP concentrations of 25 and 250 mg.kg. The experiment took place over a 41-day period at Purdue’s Ag Alumni Seed Phenotyping Facility. During this time, manual plant measurements and red-green-blue (RGB) and hyperspectral imaging were performed on 17 different dates. After the 41-day growth period, the plants were harvested and weighed, soil from pots and subject to various enzymatic assays to quantifying difference in elemental cycling potential, and DNA was extracted from both the bulk soil and the rhizosphere+roots. The 16S and ITS rRNA genes were then amplified and sequenced using the MiSeq Illumina technology and subject to various bioinformatic programs to quantify differences in composition and functional potential. This study aims to provide insights into how NP affects the rhizosphere, plants, and the associated microbiome, and the results may shed light on the environmental implications of NP contamination.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper