0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Expanding the scope and roles of social sciences and humanities to support integrated ecosystem assessments and ecosystem-based management

ICES Journal of Marine Science 2023 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jamie C. Tam, Courtenay E. Parlee, Jill Campbell-Miller, Manuel Bellanger, Jacob W. Bentley, Vahab Pourfaraj, Evan J. Andrews, Sondra Eger, Adam Cook, Gabrielle Beaulieu

Summary

Researchers explored how social sciences and humanities can be better integrated into ecosystem-based management and integrated ecosystem assessments. The study argues that human dimensions of social-ecological systems are currently underrepresented, relying primarily on economics, anthropology, and sociology while overlooking other relevant disciplines. The authors propose expanded roles for social science research to improve decision-making frameworks for marine and environmental management.

Abstract Understanding social-ecological systems (SESs) is an important part of ecosystem-based management (EBM). One of the main decision support frameworks to develop scientific advice for EBM is integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs). Human dimensions in SESs are primarily captured through indicators derived from three social sciences: economics, anthropology, and sociology. The breadth of social sciences and humanities (SSH) research is much greater than those three fields, but they are generally underused in natural science-based decision support processes such as IEAs. Greater contributions of SSHs can enhance IEAs through various direct (e.g. to develop indicators) and indirect ways (e.g. to establish and maintain ethical practices). We examine a wider range of SSH disciplines and conclude that scientific advice processes that inform EBM can benefit from broader integration of SSH theories and methods through themes of contextualizing, facilitating, communicating, evaluating, and anticipating. We see this an opportunity to both widen the vocabulary used to describe social scientists and those who work in humanities in IEAs, and apply the underlying worldviews used to conduct SSH research to fundamentally enhance the IEA process and to further progress in EBM.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Ocean governance for human health and the role of the social sciences

This paper examines the interdependence of ocean health and human health, arguing that effective ocean governance must involve the social sciences to address the complex human behaviors and institutions driving marine degradation. Managing plastic pollution entering the ocean requires governance frameworks that integrate scientific and social knowledge.

Article Tier 2

Making the Case for the Humanities’ Take on the Crucial Issue of Ecological Crisis

This paper argues for the importance of humanities perspectives in addressing the ecological crisis, contending that scientific approaches alone are insufficient and that ethical, cultural, and social analysis are essential for understanding and responding to environmental challenges.

Article Tier 2

Cumulative impact assessment for ecosystem-based marine spatial planning

This review examines how cumulative human impact assessments — which combine pressures from fishing, pollution, shipping, and other sources — can be integrated into marine spatial planning to better balance human uses against ecosystem health.

Article Tier 2

The complex interactions between humans and the marine environment require new efforts to build beauty and harmony

This perspective piece argued that effectively managing marine environments requires bridging atomistic and holistic scientific perspectives and incorporating philosophical frameworks that account for complex human-ocean interactions. The authors called for governance models that integrate natural science, social science, and stakeholder values.

Commentary Tier 3

Editorial: Solving Complex Ocean Challenges Through Interdisciplinary Research: Advances from Early Career Marine Scientists

This editorial introduces a research collection addressing complex ocean and coastal challenges through interdisciplinary approaches developed by early career marine scientists, emphasizing that accelerating anthropogenic impacts on marine biodiversity and ecosystem function require solutions that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The collection highlights the growing recognition that effective ocean conservation requires integration of natural and social sciences.

Share this paper