0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Cumulative impact assessment for ecosystem-based marine spatial planning

The Science of The Total Environment 2020 100 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Linus Hammar, Jesper H. Andersen Jesper H. Andersen Jesper H. Andersen Jesper H. Andersen Sverker Molander, Jonas Pålsson, Ulf Bergström, Jan Schmidtbauer Crona, Jesper H. Andersen Jan Schmidtbauer Crona, Gonçalo Carneiro, Thomas B. Johansson, Jesper H. Andersen Thomas B. Johansson, Duncan Hume, Jesper H. Andersen Jesper H. Andersen Gustav Kågesten, Daniel Mattsson, Daniel Mattsson, Oscar Törnqvist, Oscar Törnqvist, Jesper H. Andersen Lovisa Zillén, Lovisa Zillén, Martin Mattsson, Martin Mattsson, Ulf Bergström, Diana Perry, Chris Caldow, Chris Caldow, Jesper H. Andersen

Summary

This review examines how cumulative human impact assessments — which combine pressures from fishing, pollution, shipping, and other sources — can be integrated into marine spatial planning to better balance human uses against ecosystem health.

Study Type Environmental

Claims for ocean space are growing while marine ecosystems suffer from centuries of insufficient care. Human pressures from runoff, atmospheric emissions, marine pollution, fishing, shipping, military operations and other activities wear on habitats and populations. Ecosystem-based marine spatial planning (MSP) has emerged worldwide as a strategic instrument for handling conflicting spatial claims among competing sectors and the environment. The twofold objective of both boosting the blue economy and protecting the environment is challenging in practice and marine planners need decision support. Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA) was originally developed to provide an overview of the human imprint on the world's ocean ecosystems. We have now added a scenario component to the CIA model and used it within Swedish ecosystem-based MSP. This has allowed us to project environmental impacts for different planning alternatives throughout the planning process, strengthening the integration of environmental considerations into strategic decision-making. Every MSP decision may entail a local shift of environmental impact, causing positive or negative consequences for ecosystem components. The results from Swedish MSP in the North Sea and Baltic Sea illustrate that MSP certainly has the potential to lower net cumulative environmental impact, both locally and across sea basins, as long as environmental values are rated high and prevailing pressures derive from activities that are part of MSP. By synthesizing innumerous data into comprehensible decision support that informs marine planners of the likely environmental consequences of different options, CIA enables ecosystem-based MSP in practice.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper