0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Evaluating the effectiveness of the MicroPlastic Sediment Separator (MPSS)

Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2023 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Julia Prume, Hannes Laermanns, Martin G. J. Löder, Christian Laforsch, Christina Bogner, Martín Koch

Summary

Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of the MicroPlastic Sediment Separator (MPSS) as a laboratory method for extracting microplastics from sediment samples, addressing concerns about the lack of standardised and validated protocols in the field. The assessment examined separation efficiency, reproducibility, and suitability for obtaining accurate environmental contamination data.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Abstract Effective laboratory methods are a requirement to obtain accurate data on the contamination of the environment with microplastics. However, current methods often lack specification and validation of performance. The aim of this work was to provide the first evaluation of the effectiveness of the commercially available MicroPlastic Sediment Separator (MPSS) operated with sodium chloride. We performed density separation experiments with pristine plastic particles spiked into both commercial sand (experiment I) and natural river sediments (experiment II) and with environmental microplastics contained in natural river sediments (experiment III). The natural sediments were taken from the Lahn River in Germany, a medium-scale central European tributary. The pristine test particles were ground polypropylene fragments, sieved in three different size classes: larger than 1 mm, 0.5–1 mm, and 0.3–0.5 mm. In experiment I, the mean recovery rate was 97 % for particles of the largest size class (standard deviation $$s=6~\%$$ s = 6 % ; $$n=30$$ n = 30 per size class), but dropped to 75.33 % ( $$s=21.29~\%$$ s = 21.29 % ) in the medium and to 54 % ( $$s=25~\%$$ s = 25 % ) in the smallest size class. After density separation, 87 % of all unsuccessfully separated test particles were found at the inner walls of the MPSS. In experiment II, the recovery rate was not correlated with the particle size distribution of the natural river sediments. In experiment III, a subsequent second density separation step contributed on average 38 % ( $$s=18~\%$$ s = 18 % ; $$n=5$$ n = 5 ) to the total number of extracted environmental microplastics. This study illuminates central aspects of a density separation and aims to contribute to quality improvements of recovery rate experiments and field studies for the generation of reliable data on microplastics in the environment.

Share this paper