We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Foodborne and airborne polyethersulfone nanoplastics respectively induce liver and lung injury in mice: Comparison with microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of polyethersulfone micro and nanoplastics when consumed through food versus inhaled through air in mice. Eaten particles mainly damaged the liver by disrupting gut bacteria and metabolism, while inhaled particles primarily harmed the lungs. Nanoplastics caused more damage than microplastics in both cases, suggesting that the smallest plastic particles we breathe and eat may pose the greatest health risks.
Micro/nanoplastics (MNP) are ubiquitous in the environment and multiple living organisms. The toxicity of some common types of MNP, e.g., polyethersulfone (PES) MNP, remains poorly understood. Multi-omics approaches were used in this study to determine the effects of foodborne and airborne PES MNP on liver and lung, respectively. Foodborne MNP were capable of inducing gut microbial dysbiosis, gut and serum metabolic disruption, and liver transcriptomic dysregulation, and affecting serum antioxidant activity and liver function, resulting in liver injury. As for the airborne MNP, they were found to induce nasal and lung microbial dysbiosis, serum and lung metabolic disruption, and liver transcriptome disturbance, and cause disrupted serum antioxidant activity and lung injury. Foodborne and airborne PES NP were found to respectively induce greater liver and lung toxicity than MP, which could be associated with the differences between NP and MP exposures. The relevant results suggest that foodborne PES MNP could disrupt the "gut microbiota-gut-liver" axis and induce hepatic injury, while airborne PES MNP could affect the "airborne microbiota-lung" axis and cause lung injury. The findings could benefit the diagnoses of liver and lung injury respectively induced by foodborne and airborne PES MNP, as well as the proper use of PES in human living environment.
More Papers Like This
Size-Dependent Pulmonary Toxicity and Whole-Body Distribution of Inhaled Micro/Nanoplastic Particles in Male Mice from Chronic Exposure
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed mice to airborne micro- and nanoplastic particles through normal breathing over an extended period and found the highest accumulation in the lungs, followed by the blood and spleen. Surprisingly, the larger 1-micrometer microplastics caused more severe lung damage than the smaller 80-nanometer particles, triggering inflammation, cell death, and scarring. These findings highlight that breathing in airborne plastic particles poses real health risks, with particle size playing an important role in the type of damage caused.
Inhalation of Environmental Polystyrene Micro/Nanoplastics Induces Pulmonary Toxicity and Synergistically Exacerbates Acute Lung Injury in Male Mice
AI summary Read the abstract
Breathing in tiny plastic particles—like those found in air pollution—caused lung inflammation and breathing problems in mice, even without any other health issues. Even more concerning, mice that had already inhaled these plastic particles got much sicker when exposed to a bacterial infection afterward, suggesting that everyday plastic pollution in the air we breathe could make our lungs more vulnerable to future illness. Smaller "microplastic" particles (as opposed to even tinier "nanoplastics") seemed to cause the most damage, highlighting that size matters when it comes to how harmful these particles are.
Microplastics and nanoplastics, emerging pollutants, increased the risk of pulmonary fibrosis in vivo and in vitro: A comparative evaluation of their potential toxicity effects with different polymers and size
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the lung toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics made from polystyrene, polyethylene, and polypropylene in mice and human lung cells. They found that all particle types induced signs of pulmonary fibrosis, inflammation, and tissue remodeling, with polystyrene nanoplastics causing the most severe effects. The study suggests that smaller nanoplastic particles and certain polymer types may pose greater risks to lung health.
Integrative lipidomic and transcriptomic analysis unraveled polystyrene nanoplastics-induced liver injury via oral and inhalation exposure: All roads lead to Rome?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed mice to polystyrene nanoplastics through both oral ingestion and inhalation, and found that both routes caused liver damage but through different molecular pathways. Oral exposure mainly caused visible tissue damage, while inhaled nanoplastics triggered more severe inflammation and impaired the liver's ability to produce essential proteins. The study reveals that breathing in nanoplastics may be just as harmful to the liver as swallowing them, with different but equally concerning effects.
Deleterious effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on rodent lungs: a systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review summarizes research on how inhaled micro- and nanoplastics affect the lungs in animal studies. The findings show these particles can cause lung inflammation, tissue damage, and immune responses, suggesting that breathing in airborne microplastics may pose real risks to respiratory health.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.