0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Airborne Nanoplastics Perturb Mitochondrial Complex I via the ND6 Axis: Polymer-Specific Mitoepigenetic Remodeling Integrating Experimental, In Silico, and Machine Learning Analyses

2025

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed human lymphocytes to three types of airborne nanoplastics—polystyrene, polypropylene, and PVC—and characterized their effects on mitochondrial Complex I function, epigenetic marks, and inflammatory signaling. All three polymer types disrupted mitochondrial function through the ND6 axis, but with polymer-specific epigenetic signatures, identifying a new mitoepigenetic mechanism by which airborne nanoplastics may harm human immune cells.

Abstract Airborne nanoplastics constitute an emerging class of environmental contaminants, but their mitoepigenetic effects on human immune cells have not been systematically investigated. Ex vivo human lymphocytes were used to investigate integrated mitochondrial, epigenetic, and inflammatory responses induced by polystyrene (PS), polypropylene (PP), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nanoplastics. Fluorescence microscopy at multiple exposure time points and flow cytometry confirmed efficient cellular internalization and progressive intracellular accumulation of nanoplastics. Exposure elicited coordinated transcriptional remodeling of genes regulating mitochondrial dynamics (DRP1, MFN1), mitochondrial DNA encoded oxidative phosphorylation components (MT-ATP6, MT-COX1, MT-ND6), DNA repair (OGG1, APE1), DNA methylation machinery (DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b), and mitochondrial-associated miRNAs (miR-21, miR-34a, miR-155). Functional analyses revealed polymer and time-dependent disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential and respiratory chain activities, with Complex I identified as the primary site of vulnerability. Correlation analysis showed strong positive associations among DRP1, OMA1, DELE1, and ND6 (r > 0.9, R² > 0.8, p < 0.001), reflecting coordinated mitochondrial stress and epigenetic signaling, while negative correlations between DRP1 and MFN1 (r = -0.54, R² = 0.29, p < 0.01) and between APE and ND6 (r ≈ -0.42, R² ≈ 0.18, p < 0.05) highlight antagonistic regulation and impaired mitochondrial network stability linked to Complex I dysfunction. In silico docking of oxidized nanoplastic oligomers identified high-affinity interactions at the Complex I Fe-S cluster and cofactor-binding sites, suggesting direct interference with electron transfer. A random forest-based model accurately predicted MT-ND6 expression from Complex I activity (R² > 0.85), establishing a data-driven Complex I-ND6 axis. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that airborne nanoplastics induce integrated mitoepigenetic and immunometabolic dysregulation, underpinned by coordinated and antagonistic regulatory interactions in lymphocytes.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Polymer-specific nanoplastics trigger oxidative stress, inflammatory activation, and mitoepigenetic remodeling: in vitro and in silico evidence for MT-ND6-mediated mitochondrial complex I perturbation

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists exposed human cells to tiny plastic particles (from common plastics like polystyrene, polypropylene, and PVC) and found they damage the cell's "power plants" (mitochondria), triggering stress, inflammation, and even changes in how mitochondrial genes are switched on or off. Different plastic types caused different kinds of damage, but all disrupted a key energy-producing process, suggesting nanoplastics may harm cells in ways that could affect long-term health. Since this was a lab study on cells rather than in people, more research is needed to confirm what this means for real-world plastic exposure in humans.

Article Tier 2

Comparative Analysis of Ultrafine Particulate Matter, Black Carbon, and Polystyrene Nanoplastics Identifies Mitochondrial Stress Adaptation as a Conserved Mechanism of Immunotoxicity

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny pollution particles, from air pollution soot and even nanoplastics, all stress out the "power plants" inside our immune cells (mitochondria) in a similar way, triggering inflammation that could contribute to disease. Each type of particle does this on its own timeline: soot from combustion causes long-lasting cell damage, while nanoplastics cause a milder but still persistent stress response. This matters because it suggests a shared biological pathway behind the health harms of air pollution and plastic pollution, and it points scientists toward specific molecules that could one day be used to detect this damage early or develop treatments to protect against it.

Article Tier 2

Polystyrene nanoplastics impair mitochondrial function, quality control, and ER–mitochondria crosstalk in HeLa cells

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed human HeLa cells (grown in the lab) to polystyrene nanoplastics and measured effects on mitochondria, the cell's energy-producing structures. The nanoplastics disrupted mitochondrial energy production, increased oxidative stress markers, and interfered with communication between mitochondria and another cell structure called the endoplasmic reticulum.

Article Tier 2

Conserved and particle-specific mitochondrial stress responses drive immunotoxicity of ultrafine particulate matter, black carbon, and polystyrene nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed human white blood cells in the lab to three types of tiny particles: ultrafine soot, black carbon, and polystyrene nanoplastics. Each particle type caused stress in the cell's energy-producing mitochondria and triggered inflammation, but with different patterns and timing, suggesting both shared and particle-specific damage pathways.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics as Epigenetic Disruptors: A Biochemical Review of Environmental Pollutants and Gene Regulation

AI summary Read the abstract

This biochemical review examined how nanoplastics disrupt epigenetic regulation, focusing on their ability to alter DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA expression. The authors argued that nanoplastic-induced epigenetic changes could have lasting developmental and health consequences, especially during vulnerable life stages.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper