0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Effects of Biodegradable and Non-Biodegradable Microplastics on the Microbiota of Eurytemora affinis

SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository 2023 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jérémy Thery Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery Jérémy Thery Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery, Jérémy Thery

Summary

Exposure of the estuarine copepod Eurytemora affinis to environmentally realistic concentrations of both compostable (PBAT) and conventional (LDPE) microplastics altered the composition of the copepod's microbiome across multiple generations, with the type of polymer making no significant difference to the microbial effect. This finding is notable because it suggests that labelling a plastic as compostable does not reduce its ecological impact on the gut microbiome of a key zooplankton species, which plays a central role in aquatic food webs.

Estuaries and the marine environment are particularly impacted by microplastic (MP) pollution. The aim of this thesis was to investigate the ingestion and impact of MPs on the calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis. Indeed, this model has proven to be a metric of choice in ecotoxicology due to its sensitivity to a wide range of environmental contaminants at non-lethal concentrations. Initially, a new method was developed to identify and characterize MPs ingested by this organism in the laboratory and is also transposable to samples from the natural environment. Indeed, numerous studies have determined the effects of MPs on this model using fluorescent MPs. However, this method remains limited when it comes to studying the effects of MPs corresponding to those sampled in the natural environment, due to their diversity in shape, nature, and color. Our methodological work has therefore demonstrated the ingestion capability of MPs in this copepod. It has also proved to be generalizable to copepods contaminated with MPs sampled from the environment and has proven to be more sensitive than existing methods. Furthermore, it has confirmed a higher than previously estimated ingestion of MPs <10µm by copepods in the natural environment. Subsequently, an aging experiment of compostable (PBAT) and non-compostable (LDPE) polymers in the size range of MPs, and exposure over several generations of E. affinis was conducted. TGA, FTIR, and DSC analyses showed almost no chemical modification of the two types of plastics during aging, and a bacterial adhesion dynamic more linked to the duration of aging than to the nature of the plastic. During the multi-generational exposure experiment, our results demonstrated a true dynamic of the copepod microbiota from generation to generation. This microbiota was characteristic of the copepod compared to the water of the experiment and the algae used for feeding. At an environmental concentration, exposure to MPs caused an effect on the composition of the E. affinis microbiota for LDPE and PBAT. Interestingly, the type of MPs had no significant effect on the E. affinis microbiota. In conclusion, these results suggest that the compostable nature of a polymer like PBAT does not reduce the effects on the microbiota of E. affinis compared to another non-compostable polymer like LDPE.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper