We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Characterization of Volatile and Particulate Emissions from Desktop 3D Printers
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers characterized the volatile organic compound and particulate emissions from desktop 3D printers using PLA and ABS filaments. They found that both filament types released a wide range of potentially harmful VOCs, and that emission profiles varied not just by plastic type but also by brand. The study raises concerns about air quality and health risks for home users of 3D printers who may lack adequate ventilation.
The rapid expansion of 3D printing technologies has led to increased utilization in various industries and has also become pervasive in the home environment. Although the benefits are well acknowledged, concerns have arisen regarding potential health and safety hazards associated with emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulates during the 3D printing process. The home environment is particularly hazardous given the lack of health and safety awareness of the typical home user. This study aims to assess the safety aspects of 3D printing of PLA and ABS filaments by investigating emissions of VOCs and particulates, characterizing their chemical and physical profiles, and evaluating potential health risks. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was employed to profile VOC emissions, while a particle analyzer (WIBS) was used to quantify and characterize particulate emissions. Our research highlights that 3D printing processes release a wide range of VOCs, including straight and branched alkanes, benzenes, and aldehydes. Emission profiles depend on filament type but also, importantly, the brand of filament. The size, shape, and fluorescent characteristics of particle emissions were characterized for PLA-based printing emissions and found to vary depending on the filament employed. This is the first 3D printing study employing WIBS for particulate characterization, and distinct sizes and shape profiles that differ from other ambient WIBS studies were observed. The findings emphasize the importance of implementing safety measures in all 3D printing environments, including the home, such as improved ventilation, thermoplastic material, and brand selection. Additionally, our research highlights the need for further regulatory guidelines to ensure the safe use of 3D printing technologies, particularly in the home setting.
More Papers Like This
Tracing 3D printing emissions: Micro- and nanoplastic formation and the trade-off of mass-based mitigation.
AI summary Read the abstract
Testing five 3D printer filaments found that ASA and ABS types released micro- and nanoplastic particles, made of polyethylene and PVC rather than the original plastic. Standard printer enclosures blocked most particle mass but let smaller particles escape, which modeling estimated could increase lung deposition of inhaled particles, especially in children.
Risk assessment and toxicity effects of materials used during additive manufacturing with FDM technology
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the health risks associated with 3D printing using fused deposition modelling (FDM) technology, finding that emissions from common filaments like ABS may have carcinogenic, liver-damaging, and respiratory effects. The study emphasizes the need for safer printing materials and better protective measures for users exposed to microplastic particles and volatile compounds during printing.
Airborne Microplastic Generation and Transport from 3D Printing Activities in a University Setting
AI summary Read the abstract
3D printers in a university setting released tiny plastic particles into the air during printing. This matters because breathing in these microplastics could pose health risks, so it's worth using good ventilation or air filtration in rooms where 3D printers run, especially in shared spaces like schools and offices.
Inhaled polycarbonate feedstock 3-D printer emissions initiate a bisphenol A-like phenotype in rat liver
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that when rats breathed in fumes from 3D printers using polycarbonate plastic, their livers developed damage strikingly similar to the effects of bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical linked to hormone disruption and liver problems. This suggests that people who regularly use these 3D printers, especially in poorly ventilated spaces, may be inhaling BPA-related compounds that could harm liver health over time, highlighting a need for better ventilation and safety practices around 3D printing.
Plastic breath: Quantification of microplastics and polymer additives in airborne particles
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured microplastics and their chemical additives in airborne dust at an electronics recycling plant, identifying ten different plastic types and eight classes of additives including flame retardants and phthalates. The findings confirm that people can inhale microplastics along with potentially harmful chemicals at work, raising concerns about respiratory and overall health risks from airborne plastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.