0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres in large apex shark species: Abundance, characteristics, and recommendations for future research

Chemosphere 2023 16 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study provided the first investigation of microplastics and microfibres in large apex shark species, documenting their presence and characteristics across multiple species. The results confirm that microplastic contamination extends to marine megafauna at the top of the food web.

Microplastics and microfibres are found ubiquitously in global oceans as well as marine organisms from different trophic levels. However, little is known about the presence of microplastics and microfibres in marine megafauna, such as sharks. This study provided the first investigation of the presence of microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres (i.e., cellulose based fibres) in intestine and muscle samples of four large apex shark species in Australian coastal waters. Microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres were found in 82% of the analysed intestine samples. The mean abundance in intestine samples was 3.1 ± 2.6 particles/individual, which corresponded to 0.03 ± 0.02 particles/g of intestine, across all shark species. The size of particles ranged from 190 to 4860 μm in length with 92% being fibrous in shape and the rest fragments. FTIR spectroscopy identified that 70% of fibres were cellulose-based followed by polyethylene terephthalate (PET), while the fragments were polyethylene and polypropylene. In shark muscles, 60% of samples contained microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres, again with the majority being cellulose-based fibres followed by PET fibres. Methodological differences hinder a more comprehensive assessment of microplastic contamination across studies. Additionally, we identified some challenges which should be factored in for future studies looking at the presence of microplastics as well as other anthropogenic fibres in these large marine organisms. Overall, the findings provide first evidence of microplastics and other anthropogenic fibres not only in the intestines, but also in muscle tissues of large apex shark species.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Investigating the presence of microplastics in demersal sharks of the North-East Atlantic

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found evidence of microplastic and anthropogenic fibre ingestion in four demersal shark species from North-East Atlantic waters off the United Kingdom, investigating whether contamination levels varied by species, sex, or body size.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic contamination and risk assessment in blue shark (Prionace glauca) from the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers quantified microplastic abundance and characteristics in the digestive tracts of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) from the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean and conducted a risk assessment for microplastic pollution in this pelagic apex predator. The study found microplastics in 39.1% of specimens — predominantly blue fibers sized 46 to 3,220 micrometers — with similar abundance across sexes, indicating widespread exposure of blue sharks to microplastic pollution in open ocean environments.

Article Tier 2

Plastic ingestion and trophic transfer in an endangered top predator, the longfin mako shark (Isurus paucus), from the tropical western Pacific Ocean

AI summary Read the abstract

This study documented plastic ingestion and trophic transfer in longfin mako sharks from the tropical western Pacific, finding plastics in both the stomach contents and prey items of this endangered species, demonstrating that microplastic contamination reaches apex marine predators through trophic pathways.

Article Tier 2

Tropical sharks feasting on and swimming through microplastics: First evidence from Malaysia

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers examined microplastic contamination in five tropical shark species from Malaysian waters, finding that 100% of the 74 sharks sampled contained microplastics. A total of 2,211 plastic particles were found in gastrointestinal tracts and gills, averaging about 30 particles per shark, with black fibers being the most dominant type and polyester the most common polymer. The study suggests that microplastic uptake may be gender-related in some shark species.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic footprints in sharks and rays: First assessment of microplastic pollution in two cartilaginous fishes, hardnose shark and whitespotted whipray

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted the first assessment of microplastic pollution in two species of cartilaginous fish, the hardnose shark and whitespotted whipray, from the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman. They found microplastics in every tissue examined, including intestines, gills, and skin, with fibers and filaments being the most common forms, pointing to fishing gear and wastewater as likely sources. The study reveals that even top marine predators in these waters are heavily contaminated with microplastics.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper