We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparison Study of Macropollutant Removal in River Water Using Conventional Treatment and Nanofiber Membrane-Based System
Summary
This study compared conventional water treatment and a nanofiber membrane system for removing nitrate and phosphate from river water, with the membrane system achieving better removal. Advanced membrane filtration technology also shows promise for removing microplastics from water, making this type of water treatment research broadly relevant.
Abstract: High level of nitrate (NO3) and phosphate (PO4) concentrations in water sources due to agricultural drainage or municipal disposal can generate eutrophication. It is characterized by blooms of either green or blue-green algae, leading to a significantly drop in dissolved oxygen and frequently rendering many fish and zooplankton species unable to survive in the water. In this study, the efforts to reduce total suspended solids (TSS), NO3, and PO4 pollutant in river water are evaluated using conventional treatment and membrane filtration systems as comparisons. Conventional water treatment process uses bar screening, flocculation-coagulation, and settling/sedimentation to remove pollutants; while membrane filtration system rejects a wide range of pollutants using pore exclusion. This study assessed electrospinning membrane filtration made of polyacrilonitrile (PAN) and polyacrilonitrile/polyethylene glycol-silver nanoparticles (PAN/PEG-Ag). The effectiveness of removing pollutant levels after going through a conventional type of water treatment and 12% PAN membrane (EM1), and 12% PAN-PEGAg 1% (EM2) showed the reduction level of TSS was 82.76%, 75.86%, and 65.52 %, NO3 reduction was 73.97%, 85.62%, 83.19%, and PO4 reduction was 77.20%, 59.60%, and 53.45%. The removal efficiency using pristine PAN membrane was 81.86%, 73.02% when using the conventional process, and 64.31% when using 12% PAN-1% PEGAg. After the conventional and membrane processes, TSS and nitrate level reductions were adequate, as seen from the set quality standard values, i.e., below 50 mg/L and 10 mg/L. Meanwhile, after both water treatments, the phosphate level did not meet the water quality standard of 0.2 mg/L, as regulated in the Government Regulation Number 22 of 2021.Abstrak: Konsentrasi nitrat (NO3) dan fosfat (PO4) yang tinggi dalam sumber air karena drainase pertanian atau pembuangan kota dapat menghasilkan eutrofikasi. Hal ini ditandai dengan mekarnya ganggang hijau atau biru-hijau yang menyebabkan penurunan oksigen terlarut yang signifikan dan sering membuat banyak ikan dan spesies zooplankton tidak dapat bertahan hidup di air. Dalam studi ini, upaya untuk mengurangi polutan total padatan tersuspensi (TSS), NO3, dan PO4 dalam air sungai dievaluasi menggunakan pengolahan konvensional dan sistem filtrasi membran sebagai pembanding. Proses pengolahan air konvensional menggunakan bar screening, flokulasi-koagulasi, dan pengendapan/sedimentasi untuk menghilangkan polutan; sementara sistem filtrasi membran merejeksi berbagai macam polutan menggunakan eksklusi pori. Studi ini menilai filtrasi membran elektrospinning yang terbuat dari polyacrilonitrile (PAN) dan polyacrilonitrile/polyethylene glycol-silver nanoparticle (PAN/PEG-Ag). Efektifitas penyisihan kadar pencemar setelah melalui jenis pengolahan air secara konvensional dan membran PAN 12% (EM1), dan PAN 12%-PEGAg 1% (EM2) menunjukkan tingkat reduksi dari TSS adalah 82,76%, 75,86%, 65,52%, reduksi NO3 adalah 73,97%, 85,62%, 83,19%, dan reduksi PO4 adalah 77,20%, 59,60%, 53,45%. Efisiensi penyisihan menggunakan membran PAN murni adalah 81,86%, 73,02% bila menggunakan proses konvensional, dan 64,31% bila menggunakan 12% PAN-1% PEGAg. Setelah proses konvensional dan membran, penurunan kadar TSS dan nitrat cukup baik, terlihat dari nilai baku mutu yang ditetapkan yaitu di bawah 50 mg/L dan 10 mg/L. Sedangkan setelah dilakukan kedua pengolahan air tersebut, kadar fosfat tidak memenuhi baku mutu air yaitu 0,2 mg/L sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 Tahun 2021.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Analysis of membrane surface after the filtration of surface water containing microplastic
Researchers tested ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes on real river water containing microplastics and found both membrane types completely removed plastic particles from the filtered water, though the deposited microplastics reduced water flow through the membranes over time — confirming membrane filtration as an effective but imperfect water treatment strategy.
A review of microplastic removal from water and wastewater by membrane technologies
This review examines how membrane filtration technologies can remove microplastics from drinking water and wastewater. Researchers found that advanced membranes like nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and membrane bioreactors are among the most effective methods for capturing microplastic particles that conventional treatment plants miss. The study compares membrane approaches with other removal methods and discusses the challenges of membrane fouling caused by microplastic accumulation.
Effectiveness of Microplastic Removal from River Water Using Conventional and Ultrafiltration Techniques: Correlation with Physicochemical Parameters
This study compared conventional and ultrafiltration water treatment methods for removing microplastics from river water in Indonesia, finding that ultrafiltration achieved significantly higher MP removal efficiencies, suggesting it as a more effective option for addressing MP contamination in drinking water.
Direct filtration of microfibre-containing wastewater using nanofibre membranes: combined effects of mode of filtration and type of microfibre
Scientists tested how tiny plastic fibers from clothes and textiles affect water treatment systems that remove these pollutants from wastewater. They found that different types of plastic fibers either help or hurt the cleaning process depending on the material and how the water flows through filters. This research is important because it could help improve systems that remove microplastics from our water supply before they reach rivers, oceans, and potentially our drinking water.
Filtration Methods for Microplastic Removal in Wastewater Streams — A Review
This review surveys filtration, membrane, coagulation, and biological methods for removing microplastics from wastewater, concluding that membrane bioreactors and dynamic membranes are among the most effective current technologies. The paper provides a useful comparative overview for engineers and policymakers seeking cost-effective solutions to prevent microplastics from passing through treatment plants into waterways.