We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Modeling the trajectories of floating and non-floating microplastic particles in the water column
Summary
Researchers modeled the trajectories of both floating and non-floating microplastic particles in freshwater and marine water columns, accounting for turbulence-induced mixing, buoyancy differences, and flow characteristics that determine vertical and horizontal distribution. The study highlights that while low-density polymers like polyethylene and polypropylene are expected to concentrate at the surface, turbulent mixing drives significant depth distribution across aquatic environments.
The distribution and movement of microparticles of plastic (MP) in freshwater and marine environments are determined by the characteristics of both MP and the surrounding flow. The most common plastic polymers in the aquatic environment, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, have a density lower than the density of water. Therefore, based only on buoyancy, it is expected that most MP will be present in the surface layers of the aquatic environment. In both freshwater and marine environments, turbulence-induced mixing depends on factors such as velocity gradient and convective flow. Consequently, the surface wind, the deep temperature gradient and the breaking of waves in the surf zone can lead to the formation of turbulence and deep vertical mixing. In such conditions, in addition to gravity and buoyancy, the motion caused by turbulent mixing can affect the vertical transport and distribution of particles. The paper presents the results of modeling Lagrangian trajectories for floating particles and non-floating particles, under wave conditions they correspond to regular waves, while the particle sizes range from 10 microns to 5 mm, and the density ranges from 0.88 to 2.80 g/cm3, which is within some of the most common densities of microplastic particles.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Entrainment and vertical mixing of aquatic microplastics in turbulent flow: The coupled role of particle size and density
Researchers conducted laboratory flume experiments to study how turbulence affects the vertical mixing and entrainment of microplastic particles of different sizes and densities. Both particle size and polymer density significantly influenced mixing behavior, with smaller and denser particles more responsive to turbulent structures, informing models of microplastic transport in rivers and coastal waters.
Vertical transport of buoyant microplastic particles in the ocean: The role of turbulence and biofouling
Researchers modeled how turbulence and biofouling interact to determine the vertical movement of buoyant microplastic particles in the ocean. They identified three distinct flow regimes that govern whether microplastics stay at the surface, oscillate, or sink to the seafloor. The study helps explain the observation that even low-density microplastics are found in deep ocean sediments, suggesting biofouling-driven density changes are a key transport mechanism.
Microplastics segregation by rise velocity at the ocean surface
This study modeled the competing forces of particle buoyancy and turbulent mixing that control the vertical distribution of microplastics in the ocean surface layer, finding that particle rise velocity is the key variable that segregates plastic types and determines how they distribute relative to surface and subsurface measurements.
The role of turbulence in the deposition of intrinsically buoyant MPs
This flume study found that turbulence causes the vertical velocity of buoyant polyethylene microplastics to vary over 4 orders of magnitude compared to their rise rate in still water, explaining how lighter-than-water particles end up deposited in river and lake sediments.
The effect of wind mixing on the vertical distribution of buoyant plastic debris
Researchers modeled and measured how wind mixing affects the vertical distribution of buoyant plastic debris in the ocean, finding that turbulent mixing drives plastics below the surface and explains why surface sampling underestimates total plastic concentrations.