We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparing the microplastic content in biosolid-amended and non-amended agricultural soils
Summary
Researchers compared microplastic content in biosolid-amended agricultural soils versus non-amended control soils, examining eleven amended and nine non-amended sites to quantify the contribution of biosolid application to soil microplastic loads. The study found higher microplastic concentrations in biosolid-amended soils, confirming that biosolid application is a significant pathway for microplastic introduction into agricultural land.
Biosolids have been identified as a major source of microplastics (MP) to the environment. While they have been heavily studied, the impacts biosolids have following their amendment to agricultural soils on the MP content of these soils is poorly understood. Eleven biosolid-amended and nine non-amended agricultural fields in Southern Ontario were sampled to compare the MP content between them. Biosolid-amended fields averaged 2441.82 ± 268.03 MP kg-1, while non-amended fields averaged 775 ± 50.97 MP kg-1. Additionally, MP abundance was correlated with the type of biosolid applied, with fields that received a single application of dewatered biosolids averaging 2412.14 ± 174.81 MP kg-1, whereas fields that received a single application of liquid biosolids averaged 1689.83 ± 225.81 MP kg-1. However, differences in MP abundance were primarily dictated by differences in application rate between dewatered and liquid biosolids. In addition to increasing overall MP content, biosolid amendments influenced MP composition. Biosolid amendment increased soil fibre content, as biosolids are rich in textile fibres derived from the laundering process. As a result, biosolid-amended soils primarily contained polyester, while unamended soils primarily contained polypropylene. Quantifying and characterizing MP content in biosolid-amended fields, and understanding how it differs from unamended fields, is crucial for accurately assessing the risks microplastics pose to terrestrial ecosystems.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Transfer and transport of microplastics from biosolids to agricultural soils and the wider environment
Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in biosolids from two suppliers and in agricultural soils before and after biosolid application in Ontario, Canada, finding that biosolid application contributed 8,700–14,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of dry soil to agricultural fields.
Agricultural soils and microplastics: Are biosolids the problem?
Researchers found that agricultural soils in Southeast England contained high microplastic concentrations regardless of whether they received biosolid treatment (874 vs. 664 MP/kg), suggesting that biosolids are not the sole source and that other inputs like agricultural plastic and littering also contribute significantly.
Accumulation of microplastics in soil after long-term application of biosolids and atmospheric deposition
Researchers measured microplastic levels in agricultural soils that had received biosolid fertilizer applications over 23 years and also tracked atmospheric deposition of microplastics over two years. They found that biosolid-amended soils had significantly more microplastics than control soils, with concentrations increasing with years of application. The study also revealed that airborne microplastic deposition, while smaller in volume, represents an additional and previously underappreciated source of plastic contamination in farmland.
Microplastic fate in a chronosequence of biosolid‐amended agricultural soil in Southern Ontario, Canada
A field study in 2022 tracked the fate of microplastics in agricultural soils amended with municipal biosolids over a chronosequence of application histories, filling a gap in environmentally relevant field data. Biosolid-amended soils showed elevated microplastic concentrations, raising concerns about the circular use of these fertilizers.
Identification of microplastics extracted from field soils amended with municipal biosolids
Researchers developed a method for extracting and identifying microplastics from agricultural soils that had been treated with municipal biosolids, a common fertilizer derived from wastewater treatment. They found a variety of plastic polymer types in the soil, confirming that biosolid application is a pathway for microplastic contamination of farmland. The study provides a reliable technique for tracking how microplastics cycle through agricultural environments.