0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Fluorescent labelling as a tool for identifying and quantifying nanoplastics

RSC Advances 2024 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Patricia Merdy, Adrien Bonneau, Floriane Delpy, Yves Lucas

Summary

Researchers used fluorescent labeling with four fluorescent molecules to enable detection of nanoplastics from six common polymer types (PP, LDPE, HDPE, PS, PET, PVC) via 3D fluorescence spectral analysis. The method provides a practical approach to identifying and quantifying nanoplastics in samples where conventional spectroscopic methods face sensitivity challenges.

Advancements in microplastic research are progressing rapidly, yet detecting and identifying nanoplastics remain challenging, especially in natural samples. In this study, we addressed these challenges by employing fluorescent labeling on nanoparticles of six prevalent plastic types (PP, LDPE, HDPE, PS, PET, and PVC) to enable their specific detection via the analysis of 3D fluorescence spectra post-staining. Four fluorescent molecules were tested: cyanine-3 phosphoramidite, rhodamine-6G, fluorescein sodium salt, and Vat Red 15. Our observations indicated that adsorption onto nanoplastic particles resulted in peak shifts in the fluorescence signal, providing sufficient specificity for nanoplastic identification. Among the tested fluorophores, fluorescein was the most effective, successfully discriminating PP, PVC, HDPE, LDPE, and PS. Rhodamine-6G produced shifted signals for HDPE, LDPE, and PS but grouped them together. Cyanine-3 effectively distinguished PVC, PS, and PET, while Vat Red was only able to discriminate PVC.

Share this paper