0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Plastic and anthropogenic microfiber pollution on exposed sandy beaches in Nova Scotia, Canada

Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics 2024 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Noreen E. Kelly Noreen E. Kelly Noreen E. Kelly Olga Trela, Noreen E. Kelly Olga Trela, Heidi Gavel, Noreen E. Kelly Alyssa Vander Kuylen, Alyssa Vander Kuylen, Noreen E. Kelly Noreen E. Kelly Noreen E. Kelly

Summary

A baseline survey of two sandy beaches in Nova Scotia found low levels of microplastics (around 5 particles per 100 g of sediment), dominated by small transparent microfibers made of PET, nylon, and paint-derived alkyds. Notably, natural and semi-synthetic cellulosic microfibers were up to 19 times more abundant than plastic ones, highlighting that earlier studies likely overestimated microplastic pollution by not distinguishing plastic from non-plastic fibers.

Study Type Environmental

Aim: To investigate the baseline abundance of microplastics on two sandy beaches along an exposed coastline in an understudied region of the Northwest Atlantic. Methods: Sandy sediments were sampled from two beaches along the eastern shore of Nova Scotia, Canada from High, Mid, and Low intertidal positions. Density floatation using a sodium iodide (NaI) solution was used to separate particles from 100 g of sediments in each sample. Particles were characterized by size, shape, and colour, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was conducted for polymer identification. Results: At both beaches, the majority of particles found were small (< 1.4 mm), transparent microfibers. Microplastics were polymers of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), nylon, or alkyds (paints). The mean concentrations at both beaches were similar, at 5.08 ± 3.20 and 5.58 ± 4.52 microplastics per 100 g of sediment. Non-plastic (i.e., natural and semi-synthetic cellulosic) microfibers were up to 19 times more abundant than microplastics, with mean concentrations of 75.9 ± 60.1 and 97.7 ± 87.9 per 100 g sediment. Mean particle counts did not differ significantly across tidal ranges due to their high variability over small spatial scales (10 s of m). Conclusion: Using new investigative tools yielded estimates of microplastic pollution 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than earlier research conducted at these sites, and was generally lower than values reported from other beaches globally. Sources of microfibers were potentially from high recreational use at these sites. Future monitoring could target these sites for time series analysis of microplastic change on exposed sandy beaches.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper