We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nanoplastics Affect the Bioaccumulation and Gut Toxicity of Emerging Perfluoroalkyl Acid Alternatives to Aquatic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis): Importance of Plastic Surface Charge
Summary
This study found that nanoplastics changed how a toxic industrial chemical called F-53B accumulated in aquatic insect larvae and made its harmful effects worse. Positively charged nanoplastics were especially dangerous because they carried more of the chemical into the insects' guts, increasing oxidative stress and inflammation. The findings suggest that nanoplastics in the environment can act as carriers that increase the toxicity of other pollutants, potentially amplifying risks throughout the food chain.
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) have been widely suggested as contributors to the aquatic insect biomass decline, and their bioavailability is affected by engineered particles. However, the toxicity effects of emerging ionizable POPs mediated by differentially charged engineered nanoparticles on aquatic insects are unknown. In this study, 6:2 chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate (F-53B, an emerging perfluoroalkyl acid alternative) was selected as a model emerging ionizable POP; the effect of differentially charged nanoplastics (NPs, 50 nm, 0.5 g/kg) on F-53B bioaccumulation and gut toxicity to Chironomus kiinensis were investigated through histopathology, biochemical index, and gut microbiota analysis. The results showed that when the dissolved concentration of F-53B remained constant, the presence of NPs enhanced the adverse effects on larval growth, emergence, gut oxidative stress and inflammation induced by F-53B, and the enhancement caused by positively charged NP-associated F-53B was stronger than that caused by the negatively charged one. This was mainly because positively charged NPs, due to their greater adsorption capacity and higher bioavailable fraction of associated F-53B, increased the bioaccumulation of F-53B in larvae more significantly than negatively charged NPs. In addition, positively charged NPs interact more easily with gut biomembranes and microbes with a negative charge, further increasing the probability of F-53B interacting with gut biomembranes and microbiota and thereby aggravating gut damage and key microbial dysbacteriosis related to gut health. These findings demonstrate that the surface charge of NPs can regulate the bioaccumulation and toxicity of ionizable POPs to aquatic insects.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota
Researchers exposed aquatic insect larvae to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the surface charge significantly affected how toxic the particles were. Positively charged nanoplastics caused more severe gut damage, greater accumulation in tissues, and bigger disruptions to gut bacteria. This matters because nanoplastics in the real environment carry various charges, and the findings suggest that charge is an important factor in determining health risks.
Nanoplastics Drive the Charge-specific Decline of Aquatic Insect (Chironomus kiinensis) Emergence through Inducing Oxidative Damage and Perturbing the Endocrine System
Researchers found that nanoplastics with a positive electrical charge were more harmful to aquatic insects than negatively charged ones, reducing emergence rates by over 22% at environmentally relevant concentrations. The positively charged particles were absorbed more easily by larvae due to stronger attraction to cell membranes, causing greater oxidative damage and hormonal disruption.
NanoplasticsDrivethe Charge-specific Decline ofAquatic Insect (Chironomus kiinensis) Emergence through Inducing Oxidative Damage and Perturbing theEndocrine System
This study exposed the aquatic insect Chironomus kiinensis to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations and measured emergence rates. Positively charged nanoplastics caused greater reduction in emergence (77.8% vs 85.6% emergence rate) due to higher accumulation in tissues and more pronounced oxidative damage and endocrine disruption.
Recent advances in toxicological research of nanoplastics in the environment: A review
Researchers systematically reviewed nanoplastic toxicology, finding that surface charge and particle size are the dominant determinants of harm — positively charged and smaller particles penetrate cell membranes more readily — and that adsorbed contaminants released inside organisms often pose greater toxicological risks than the nanoplastic particles themselves.
Nanoplastics under the charge effects: Unveiling the potential threats to amphibian (Rana nigromaculata) growth, intestinal damage and microbial ecology
Researchers exposed frog tadpoles to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that both types reduced survival rates, with positively charged particles causing more severe intestinal damage. The positively charged nanoplastics triggered greater oxidative stress in gut tissue and significantly disrupted the diversity of beneficial gut bacteria involved in nutrient absorption. The study suggests that the surface charge of nanoplastics plays an important role in determining how harmful they are to aquatic organisms.