We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effects of charged polystyrene microplastics on the bioavailability of dufulin in tomato plant
Summary
Researchers studied how differently charged polystyrene microplastics affect the uptake of a pesticide called Dufulin in hydroponic tomato plants. They found that all types of microplastics reduced plant growth and decreased the amount of pesticide absorbed by the tomatoes, with negatively charged particles having the strongest effect. The study suggests that microplastics in agricultural systems may alter how pesticides accumulate in food crops.
Microplastics (MPs) and pesticides commonly exist in the environment, yet the interactions between them and their subsequent impacts on plants remain poorly understood. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impacts of differently charged polystyrene (PS) MPs, including PS-COO, PS and PS-NH MPs, on the fate of C-labelled new antiviral pesticide Dufulin (DFL) in a hydroponic tomato system. The results showed that MPs greatly reduced the growth of tomato plants, with suppression of 18.4-30.2%. Compared to the control group, PS-COO, PS and PS-NH MPs also reduced the bioaccumulation of DFL in whole tomato plants by 40.3%, 34.5%, and 26.1%, respectively. Furthermore, MPs influenced the translocation of DFL in plant tissues, and the values decreased at the rates of 38.7%, 26.5% and 15.7% for PS-COO, PS and PS-NH, respectively. Interestingly, compared to the control group, PS-COO exhibited a profound inhibitory effect on DFL concentrations in tomatoes, potentially resulting in a lower dietary risk in the hydroponic tomato system. This may be due to the strong adsorption between PS-COO and DFL, and PS-COO may also inhibit the growth of tomato plants. Overall, our study could provide valuable insights into the risk assessment of DFL in the presence of MPs in plant systems.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Adsorption behavior of azole fungicides on polystyrene and polyethylene microplastics
Researchers studied how polystyrene and polyethylene microplastics adsorb azole fungicides commonly used in agriculture. The study found that smaller microplastic particle sizes led to stronger adsorption capacity, and factors like pH, ionic strength, and the presence of organic acids all influenced how readily pesticides bind to microplastic surfaces.
Toxicity Mechanisms of Nanoplastics on Crop Growth, Interference of Phyllosphere Microbes, and Evidence for Foliar Penetration and Translocation
Researchers exposed tomato plants to nanoplastics with different surface charges and found that positively charged particles caused the most damage, including stunted growth, increased stress responses, and disruption of the leaf microbiome. The nanoplastics penetrated through leaves and traveled to the roots, demonstrating that atmospheric plastic pollution can contaminate crops from above. This is a concern for food safety, as nanoplastics accumulating in edible plants could be a route of human exposure.
Differentially charged nanoplastics demonstrate distinct accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Researchers exposed Arabidopsis thaliana plants to positively and negatively charged polystyrene nanoplastics and found that charge determined accumulation patterns, with positively charged particles penetrating deeper into root and leaf tissues than negatively charged ones.
Effects of Microplastics on Bioavailability, Persistence and Toxicity of Plant Pesticides: An Agricultural Perspective
This review examines how microplastics in soil interact with pesticides, generally reducing pesticide effectiveness by absorbing the chemicals onto their surfaces. While this lowers the immediate toxicity of pesticides, it also makes them last longer in the environment and may reduce pest control in agriculture, potentially affecting food production and the long-term safety of the food supply.
Do differentially charged nanoplastics affect imidacloprid uptake, translocation, and metabolism in Chinese flowering cabbage?
Researchers found that positively charged nanoplastics inhibited plant growth and reduced imidacloprid translocation in Chinese flowering cabbage, while negatively charged nanoplastics accelerated pesticide accumulation in shoots, revealing charge-dependent interactions affecting food safety.