0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Evaluating the retention of airborne microplastics on plant leaf: Influence of leaf morphology

Environmental Pollution 2024 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Kushani Perera, Kushani Perera, Kushani Perera, Kushani Perera, Kushani Perera, Kushani Perera, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Susan Bengtson Nash Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Kushani Perera, Susan Bengtson Nash Susan Bengtson Nash Susan Bengtson Nash Susan Bengtson Nash Susan Bengtson Nash Susan Bengtson Nash Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Susan Bengtson Nash Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Susan Bengtson Nash Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Shima Ziajahromi, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Susan Bengtson Nash Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Kushani Perera, Shima Ziajahromi, Frédéric D.L. Leusch, Susan Bengtson Nash

Summary

Researchers tested how well different plant species capture airborne microplastics on their leaves and found that plants with textured surfaces like tiny hairs (trichomes) or divided leaflets trapped the most particles. PET fibers were the most common type of airborne microplastic captured. The study suggests that indoor and outdoor plants could help reduce the airborne microplastics that people breathe in, offering a simple, natural strategy to lower human exposure.

Polymers
Models

Airborne microplastics (AMPs) have been identified in both indoor and outdoor environments and account for a large portion of an individual's daily exposure to microplastics. Thus, it is crucial to find effective methods to capture and control the levels of AMPs and ultimately reduce human exposure. While terrestrial plants have been recognized for their effectiveness in capturing airborne particles, little is known about their ability to capture AMPs. This study investigated the ability of 8 natural plant species and 2 artificial plants to capture AMPs, as well as the influence of leaf morphology on this retention. Plant leaves were exposed to AMPs for two weeks, and deposited AMPs were characterized using a Micro-Fourier Transform Infrared (μ-FTIR)spectroscopy. Selected cleaned leaves were further digested, and the presence of subsurface AMPs was confirmed using μ-Raman spectroscopy. Results revealed that AMPs were retained on the leaves of all selected plant species at concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 0.87 n/cm. The highest average concentration was observed on an artificial plant with fenestrated leaves, followed by natural plant species with trichomes and leaflets. The lowest concentration was observed on a natural plant with smooth leaves. The majority (90%) of retained AMPs were fibres, and the remaining were fragments. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was the prominent polymer type. Additionally, AMP fragments were observed in the leaf subsurface in one selected species, likely retained within the leaf cuticles. The results suggest that plant leaves can indiscriminately retain AMPs on their surfaces and act as temporary sinks for AMPs. Additionally, indoor plants may provide a useful functional role in reducing indoor AMP concentrations, although longer-term studies are needed to ascertain their retention capacity more accurately over time and to evaluate the capability of indoor plants to act as a suitable, cost-effective candidate for reducing AMPs.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper