0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Effects of true to life polyethylene terephthalate and polycaprolactone nanoparticles on macrophages under a repeated exposure mode

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared how macrophages respond to repeated low-dose exposure to persistent PET nanoparticles versus biodegradable polycaprolactone nanoparticles. They found that cells adapted over repeated exposures, showing less dramatic changes than in single-dose experiments, but PET nanoparticles still induced oxidative stress, reduced phagocytic ability, and triggered pro-inflammatory responses. The study suggests that the biopersistence of conventional plastic nanoparticles like PET may pose more sustained immune system effects compared to biodegradable alternatives.

Polymers
Body Systems

Micro and nanoplastics are pollutants which concentration in different biotopes increases continuously over time, which poses the question of their potential effects on health. In animals, these micro and nanoplastics are recognized as particulate materials and thus handled by macrophages,which are therefore a key cell type to study. Most studies have used an experimental scheme in which the cells of interest are exposed to a single dose of plastics, and where the readout of the studied parameters is made immediately after exposure. However, this classical experimental scheme does not take into account the impact of biopersistence, nor the potential cellular adaptation that may take place when cells are exposed repeatedly to a low dose of plastics. We thus used a repeated exposure scheme, in order to better take into account these phenomena. Within this frame, we compared the macrophages responses to a persistent nanoplastic, i.e. true-to-life polyethylene terephthalate nanoparticles and to a biodegradable nanoplastic, i.e. polycaprolactone, by a combination of proteomic and targeted experiments. Our results show that under this repeated exposure scheme, the proteome changes were of a lesser extent than under the acute exposure mode, indicating cell adaptation. However, polyethylene terephthalate nanoparticles induced oxidative stress, a slight depression of phagocytosis and a pro-inflammatory response, while polycaprolactone nanoparticles induced a depression of macrophages functions, especially regarding cytokines production (Interleukin 6, MCP-1, TNF alpha) in response to a bacterial challenge (represented by a lipopolysaccharide challenge), indicating harmful but different effects of both nanoplastics even in the repeated exposure scheme.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Effects of true to life polyethylene terephthalate and polycaprolactone nanoparticles on macrophages under a repeated exposure mode

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed macrophages to PET and polycaprolactone nanoparticles under a repeated-dose exposure scheme mimicking chronic environmental exposure, finding that repeated exposures altered immune cell function differently than single-dose protocols commonly used in prior studies.

Article Tier 2

A comparison of the effects of polystyrene and polycaprolactone nanoplastics on macrophages

AI summary Read the abstract

A comparison of polystyrene and polycaprolactone nanoplastics on macrophage immune cells found both types induced adverse cellular effects, with the study highlighting that plastic persistence in the environment may drive progressive accumulation leading to chronic immune system impacts.

Article

Effects of polystyrene and polylactide nanoparticles on macrophages under a repeated exposure mode

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared the responses of macrophages to repeated low-dose exposure to persistent polystyrene nanoparticles and biodegradable polylactide (PLA) nanoparticles, finding that proteome changes were reduced (PS) or similar (PLA) compared to acute single-dose exposure, indicating cell adaptation. However, PLA particles induced mitochondrial dysfunction and suppressed immune responses to bacterial danger signals, while PS caused slight immune function alterations, indicating harmful effects persisting even under repeated low-dose exposure.

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene terephthalate nanoparticles effect on RAW 264.7 macrophage cells

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed mouse immune cells to PET nanoplastics (tiny particles from plastic bottles and containers) and found the cells easily absorbed them, triggering mild oxidative stress and switching on several genes linked to immune defense and cell maintenance, providing early evidence of how nanoplastics may affect human immune function.

Article Tier 2

Biobased, biodegradable but not bio-neutral: about the effects of polylactic acid nanoparticles on macrophages

AI summary Read the abstract

When immune cells called macrophages encounter polylactic acid (PLA) nanoparticles — a supposedly biobased and biodegradable plastic — they can degrade the particles but trigger a range of cellular stress responses in the process. This challenges the idea that bioplastics are biologically inert, suggesting that 'biodegradable' does not mean 'harmless' once particles enter the body.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper