We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Influence of Concentration, Surface Charge, and Natural Water Components on the Transport and Adsorption of Polystyrene Nanoplastics in Sand Columns
AI summary Read the abstract
Laboratory column experiments showed that nanoplastics made of polystyrene behave very differently in groundwater depending on their surface charge — positively charged particles were retained much more readily in sand than negatively charged ones, and the presence of natural organic matter in real lake water reduced the retention of both types. These findings matter for understanding whether nanoplastics released into the environment will travel through soil and reach drinking water sources, which depends critically on the plastic's surface chemistry.
Information about the influence of surface charges on nanoplastics (NPLs) transport in porous media, the influence of NPL concentrations on porous media retention capacities, and changes in porous media adsorption capacities in the presence of natural water components are still scarce. In this study, laboratory column experiments are conducted to investigate the transport behavior of positively charged amidine polystyrene (PS) latex NPLs and negatively charged sulfate PS latex NPLs in quartz sand columns saturated with ultrapure water and Geneva Lake water, respectively. Results obtained for ultrapure water show that amidine PS latex NPLs have more affinity for negatively charged sand surfaces than sulfate PS latex NPLs because of the presence of attractive electrical forces. As for the Geneva Lake water, under natural conditions, both NPL types and sand are negatively charged. Therefore, the presence of repulsion forces reduces NPL's affinity for sand surfaces. The calculated adsorption capacities of sand grains for the removal of both types of NPLs from both types of water are oscillating around 0.008 and 0.004 mg g-1 for NPL concentrations of 100 and 500 mg L-1, respectively. SEM micrography shows individual NPLs or aggregates attached to the sand and confirms the limited role of the adsorption process in NPL retention. The important NPL retention, especially in the case of negatively charged NPLs, in Geneva Lake water-saturated columns is related to heteroaggregate formation and their further straining inside narrow pores. The presence of DOM and metal cations is then crucial to trigger the aggregation process and NPL retention.
More Papers Like This
Retention and Transport of Nanoplastics with Different Surface Functionalities in a Sand Filtration System
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested how well sand filtration removes nanoplastics with different surface chemistries — a key question since nanoplastics are increasingly detected in drinking water sources. Surface charge strongly influenced whether nanoplastics were retained or passed through the filter, with negatively charged particles being harder to remove.
Effects of clay minerals on the transport of polystyrene nanoplastic in groundwater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how clay minerals affect nanoplastic transport in groundwater, finding that montmorillonite, kaolinite, and illite each uniquely influenced polystyrene nanoparticle mobility, with montmorillonite showing the strongest retention capacity due to its high surface charge.
Effects of size and surface charge on the sedimentation of nanoplastics in freshwater
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated how size and surface charge of polystyrene nanoplastics affect their sedimentation behavior in freshwater, finding that both properties significantly influence aggregation dynamics and settling rates, with implications for predicting nanoplastic fate in aquatic environments.
Weathering of nanoplastics reduces the effect of sand surface heterogeneity on their attachment in saturated porous media
AI summary Read the abstract
Tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) behave differently in soil and sand once they've been "weathered" by sunlight and natural organic matter — this aging process actually makes them travel more easily through sand instead of getting stuck, because it changes their surface charge. This matters because it suggests weathered nanoplastics — the kind actually found in the environment — may move through soil and groundwater more readily than lab tests on fresh, unweathered plastic suggest, potentially reaching drinking water sources faster than previously assumed.
Microplastics/nanoplastics in porous media: Key factors controlling their transport and retention behaviors
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines what controls how microplastics and nanoplastics move through soil and other porous materials like sand and sediment. Factors like particle size, shape, surface charge, water flow speed, and the presence of other pollutants all influence whether plastics stay in place or travel deeper into groundwater. Understanding these transport behaviors is important for assessing the risk of microplastics contaminating underground drinking water sources.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.