We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Disposable surgical/medical face masks and filtering face pieces: Source of microplastics and chemical additives in the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested how many microplastics and chemicals leach from disposable face masks into water, finding that filtering face pieces (like N95 masks) released 3 to 4 times more microplastic particles than standard surgical masks. The study also identified potentially harmful chemicals leaching from the masks, including bisphenol B, which had not been previously reported in mask materials. Since billions of disposable masks have been used and discarded since the pandemic, they represent a significant and growing source of microplastic pollution in the environment.
The production and consumption of disposable face masks (DFMs) increased intensely during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a high amount of them being found in the terrestrial and aquatic environment. The main goal of this research study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of the water-leachability of microplastics (MPs) and chemical additives from various types of disposable surgical/medical face masks (MM DFMs) and filtering face pieces (FFPs). Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy was used for MPs analysis. Liquid Chromatography/High Resolution Mass Spectrometry was used to analyse analytes presented in the water-leachates of DFMs. FFPs released 3-4 times more microplastic particles compared to MM DFMs. The release of MPs into water from all tested DFMs without mechanical stress suggests potential MP contamination originating from the DFM production process. Our study for the first time identified bisphenol B (0.25-0.42 μg/L) and 1,4-bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (163.9-115.0 μg/L) as leachables from MM DFMs. MPs in the water-leachates vary in size, with predominant particles <100 μm, and the release order from DFMs is MMIIR > MMII > FFP3>FFP2>MMI. The main type of microplastics identified in the water leachates of the investigated face masks was polypropylene, accounting for 93-97% for MM DFMs and 82-83% for FFPs. Other polymers such as polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyester/polyethylene terephthalate, polyamide/Nylon, polyvinylchloride, and ethylene-propylene copolymer were also identified, but in smaller amounts. FFPs released a wider variety and a higher percentage (17-18%) of other polymers compared to MM DFMs (3-7%). Fragments and fibres were identified in all water-leachate samples, and fragments, particularly debris of polypropylene fibres, were the most common MP morphotype. The findings in this study are important in contributing additional data to develop science-based policy recommendations on the health and environmental impacts of MPs and associated chemical additives originated from DFMs.
More Papers Like This
COVID-19 disposable face masks: source of microplastics and chemical additives in the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated COVID-19 disposable face masks as a new source of microplastics and chemical additives in the environment, analyzing particles released from masks submerged in water under different conditions. The masks released significant quantities of microplastic fibers and chemical additives, with quantities increasing with aging and sunlight exposure. The pandemic-era surge in disposable mask use created a new and largely unquantified pathway for plastic contamination of waterways.
Uncovering the Release of Micro/nanoplastics from Disposable Face Masks at Times of COVID-19
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that disposable face masks release significant amounts of micro- and nanoplastic particles when subjected to water exposure and mechanical stress similar to environmental conditions. This confirms that the massive use of masks during COVID-19 introduced new sources of microplastic pollution into the environment.
Evaluation of the leaching of microplastics from discarded medical masks in aquatic environments: a case study of Mashhad city
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested ten brands of COVID-19 face masks for microplastic release in water, finding that N95 masks shed the most particles due to their heavier construction, with fibers being the most common shape released. The findings highlight that the billions of disposable masks used globally each month represent a significant and growing source of microplastic pollution in aquatic environments.
An investigation into the leaching of micro and nano particles and chemical pollutants from disposable face masks - linked to the COVID-19 pandemic
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers submerged seven disposable face mask brands in water to simulate environmental littering, detecting micro- and nanoscale plastic fibers, heavy metals including lead and cadmium, and plastic additive chemicals such as polyamide oligomers and surfactants leaching into the water — raising questions about both everyday safety and post-disposal pollution.
Used disposable face masks are significant sources of microplastics to environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated whether disposable face masks release microplastics into water and found that used masks released significantly more particles than new ones, increasing from about 183 particles per piece for new masks to much higher levels after use. The study suggests that the massive increase in disposable mask consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic has made improperly discarded masks a significant new source of microplastic pollution.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.