0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Sources of microplastics to two Southeast Michigan rivers and biofilm responses plastic substrata

2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jennifer L. Troost, Sadie M. Baker, Morgan H. Chaudry, Kristin E. Judd

Summary

Researchers measured microplastic loads upstream and downstream of two southeast Michigan wastewater treatment plants to assess their contribution to rivers feeding Lake Erie, and conducted experiments on the effects of plastic substrates on stream biofilm function. They found that wastewater treatment plants were significant sources of microplastics to receiving rivers, with plastic substrates also influencing biofilm community responses.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Plastic pollution is an emergent global issue in freshwater and marine ecosystems. Microplastics can be introduced into waterways from a variety of sources, although the relative importance of a source for a given watershed is not well understood. To determine whether medium-sized wastewater treatment plants are significant sources of microplastics to rivers that feed into Lake Erie, we measured microplastic load up and downstream of two southeast Michigan wastewater treatment plants. We also performed experiments to test the effects of plastic on stream biofilm function. We detected a significant increase in the microplastic load downstream from the Ypsilanti wastewater treatment plant, which empties into the Lower Rouge River but not the Ann Arbor wastewater treatment plant, which empties into the Huron River. However, the background microplastic load was 10x higher in the Huron River compared to the Lower Rouge River, likely obscuring our ability to detect microplastic wastewater inputs. We found a positive relationship between river discharge and microplastic load at the Huron River site, which drains a larger watershed area than the Lower Rouge site, suggesting that watershed sources may be more important than wastewater treatment plant inputs over larger spatial scales. In biofilm experiments, biofilms grown on high-density polyethylene and polypropylene had significantly lower metabolic diversity and metabolic response, respectively. Overall, our findings indicate that attention should be directed to both point and nonpoint sources to reduce microplastic pollution and that plastics may negatively affect the function of stream biofilm communities.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The Effect of Microplastics on Microbial Succession at Impaired and Unimpaired Sites in a Riverine System

Researchers compared microbial biofilm diversity on microplastic polymers and natural substrates at impaired and unimpaired riverine sites, examining how environmental nutrient loads, seasonality, and geography influence microbiome succession on plastic surfaces in freshwater ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Longitudinal patterns of microplastic concentration and bacterial assemblages in surface and benthic habitats of an urban river

This study measured microplastic concentrations and microbial communities in a river from source to mouth, finding that both plastic levels and unique plastisphere bacterial communities increased downstream of wastewater treatment plant outflows. The results identify wastewater discharge as a key driver of both microplastic loading and microbial community shifts in rivers.

Article Tier 2

Wastewater-induced microplastic biofouling in freshwater: role of particle size and flow velocity

This study examined how wastewater discharge promotes biofouling — the colonization of microplastics by microorganisms — in freshwater environments, finding that particle size and wastewater-derived nutrients both influenced biofilm formation rates and community composition. Wastewater-exposed microplastics rapidly developed distinct microbial communities.

Article Tier 2

Biofilms on plastic litter in an urban river: Community composition and activity vary by substrate type

Researchers examined biofilms colonizing plastic litter versus natural surfaces in an urban river, finding that community composition and metabolic activity vary by substrate type, with plastic surfaces hosting distinct microbial communities that may influence plastic degradation rates.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic is an Abundant and Distinct Microbial Habitat in an Urban River

Researchers demonstrated that microplastic surfaces in an urban river host a microbial community that is distinct from surrounding water and sediment communities, establishing microplastic as an abundant and ecologically distinct habitat for river microorganisms.

Share this paper