0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Unravelling protein corona formation on pristine and leached microplastics

Microplastics and Nanoplastics 2024 23 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Amanda Louise Dawson, Utpal Bose, Dongdong Ni, Joost L.D. Nelis

Summary

Researchers found that when microplastics encounter proteins in biological fluids, they get coated in a "protein corona" that depends heavily on the plastic's chemical additives, surface area, and how much it has been weathered in the environment. This coating changes how microplastics behave in the body, meaning toxicity studies need to account for these real-world surface changes.

Abstract Upon entering the environment, the surface properties of pristine plastics are rapidly altered due to interactions with exogenous biomolecules, contaminants, and even microbiota, which ultimately alter their ecological impacts. When present in biological fluids or high protein environments, micro(nano)plastics bind with proteins, which form a protein corona around the particle. Although a significant body of literature exists on protein corona formation on nanomaterials, less is known about how the physiochemical properties of microplastics may influence protein corona formation. This study utilises quantitative proteomics to quantify protein binding to pristine and leached microplastics. Pristine polyethylene (PE) beads (50 and 500 μm), polyamide (PA) fibres (100 μm), polyethylene terephthalate fibres (500 μm), and fragments (< 300 μm), as well as pristine and leached textile microfibres comprised of PET, recycled PET, PA or cotton were incubated for 24 h in bovine serum albumin solution (2 mg mL −1 ) to form a protein corona. Protein adsorption to microplastics was dependant on particle surface area to volume ratio but only when additives were absent. For environmentally relevant textile microfibres, cotton microfibres adsorbed significantly more protein than synthetic microfibres. Fourteen-day aqueous leaching increased the zeta potential of all microfibres. However, only PA fibres adsorbed significantly higher protein on the leached fibres compared to their pristine counterparts. Overall, the presence of chemical additives in microplastics strongly influenced protein corona formation, and this phenomenon should be incorporated into routine microplastic toxicity assessment. Graphical Abstract

Share this paper