We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas
Summary
Researchers raise methodological concerns about a widely cited study that found microplastics and nanoplastics in arterial plaque, noting that the lack of contamination controls, the unusually small particle sizes detected, and the limited verification methods make it difficult to confirm whether the particles came from inside the body or were introduced during surgery.
Microplastics and Nanoplastics in AtheromasTo the Editor: Marfella et al. (March 7 issue) 1 found the presence of microplastics and nanoplastics (MNPs) in carotid artery plaque and linked it with a higher risk of cardiovascular events.However, many factors suggest potential external plastic contamination of samples collected in this study. 2First, no pre-analytical anticontamination procedures were implemented (only the use of glass tubes is mentioned), so credible detection of MNPs may be questioned.The surgical environment and equipment contain many MNPs, including polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride, and the risk of contamination with MNP intraoperatively is very high. 3Also, no blank samples from the operating room were tested. 4 The sizes of the MNPs that were detected in this study were considerably smaller than those detected in previous studies (<1 m vs. 3 to 469 m). 2,3 MNPs in samples should also be detected by means of several complementary methods, whereas only gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for all plaques, and scanning electron microscopy with stable isotope analysis was used only for selected MNP-positive samples for confirmation, a protocol that may have introduced bias. 5 Without addressing these key methodologic issues, the results of this study may not be fully reliable.