0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Remediation Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Interfacial Interactions between Nanoplastics and Biological Systems: toward an Atomic and Molecular Understanding of Plastics-Driven Biological Dyshomeostasis

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024 11 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Afroz Karim, Anju Yadav, Ummy Habiba Sweety, Jyotish Kumar, Sofia A. Delgado, J.A. Hernández, Jason C. White, Lela Vuković, Mahesh Narayan

Summary

This study investigated how nanoplastics interact with biological molecules at the atomic level, finding that polystyrene nanoplastics can destroy the structure of proteins, disrupt cell membranes, and damage DNA. The nanoplastics essentially unfolded a milk protein, punched holes in cell membranes, and broke DNA strands. These findings help explain at a fundamental level how nanoplastics found in human blood, milk, and tissues could cause the inflammation and disease seen in other studies.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type In vivo

Micro- and nano-plastics (NPs) are found in human milk, blood, tissues, and organs and associate with aberrant health outcomes including inflammation, genotoxicity, developmental disorders, onset of chronic diseases, and autoimmune disorders. Yet, interfacial interactions between plastics and biomolecular systems remain underexplored. Here, we have examined experimentally, in vitro, in vivo, and by computation, the impact of polystyrene (PS) NPs on a host of biomolecular systems and assemblies. Our results reveal that PS NPs essentially abolished the helix-content of the milk protein β-lactoglobulin (BLG) in a dose-dependent manner. Helix loss is corelated with the near stoichiometric formation of β-sheet elements in the protein. Structural alterations in BLG are also likely responsible for the nanoparticle-dependent attrition in binding affinity and weaker on-rate constant of retinol, its physiological ligand (compromising its nutritional role). PS NP-driven helix-to-sheet conversion was also observed in the amyloid-forming trajectory of hen egg-white lysozyme (accelerated fibril formation and reduced helical content in fibrils). Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to PS NPs exhibited a decrease in the fluorescence of green fluorescent protein-tagged dopaminergic neurons and locomotory deficits (akin to the neurotoxin paraquat exposure). Finally, in silico analyses revealed that the most favorable PS/BLG docking score and binding energies corresponded to a pose near the hydrophobic ligand binding pocket (calyx) of the protein where the NP fragment was found to make nonpolar contacts with side-chain residues via the hydrophobic effect and van der Waals forces, compromising side chain/retinol contacts. Binding energetics indicate that PS/BLG interactions destabilize the binding of retinol to the protein and can potentially displace retinol from the calyx region of BLG, thereby impairing its biological function. Collectively, the experimental and high-resolution in silico data provide new insights into the mechanism(s) by which PS NPs corrupt the bimolecular structure and function, induce amyloidosis and onset neuronal injury, and drive aberrant physiological and behavioral outcomes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics as a Potential Environmental Health Factor: From Molecular Interaction to Altered Cellular Function and Human Diseases

This review examined how nanoplastics — particularly polystyrene — interact with cells at the molecular level, potentially causing lasting changes that could contribute to developmental problems and degenerative disease. The study highlights growing concerns about nanoplastics as an emerging environmental health risk given their widespread presence in food, water, and air.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastic–Biomolecular Interactions

This review examines how nanoplastics interact with the biomolecules of living organisms — including proteins, DNA, lipids, and cellular membranes — and how these interactions drive biological harm at the molecular level. Understanding nanoplastic-biomolecule interactions is foundational to explaining why plastic particles at the nanoscale may pose greater health risks than larger microplastics, since they can penetrate cell membranes and reach intracellular targets.

Article Tier 2

Perturbation of Nanoplastics on Biomembranes: Molecular Insights from Neutron Scattering

Using neutron scattering, researchers found that polystyrene nanoplastics — with and without surface modifications — perturb the structure and dynamics of both simple and complex bacterial-model biomembranes, suggesting nanoplastics can physically disrupt cell membrane function.

Article Tier 2

Exploring the Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Macromolecular Structure and Functions

This review explores how micro- and nanoplastics interact with the building blocks of our cells, including proteins, fats, and DNA. The plastics can cause oxidative stress, disrupt hormones, damage genetic material, cause proteins to misfold, and destabilize cell membranes. The authors propose that these effects are interconnected through feedback loops that could accelerate cellular aging and potentially pass harmful changes to future generations.

Article Tier 2

Polystyrene and polyethylene perturb the structure of membrane: An experimental and computational study

Researchers combined cell experiments, molecular dynamics simulations, and toxicogenomic analysis to show that polystyrene and polyethylene nanoplastics — individually and as a mixture — physically penetrate cell membranes and form pores, with the mixture producing stronger disruption than either polymer alone.

Share this paper