0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Nanoplastic Size and Surface Chemistry Dictate Decoration by Human Saliva Proteins

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024 14 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers discovered that when nanoplastics enter the human mouth, saliva proteins quickly coat the particles, and the type of coating depends on the plastic's size and surface charge. Smaller particles attracted more proteins and the protein coatings affected how cells responded to the nanoplastics in laboratory tests. This is significant because it means the body's first interaction with ingested nanoplastics changes their biological identity, which could influence how they are absorbed and where they end up in the body.

Polymers
Models

Environmental pollution with plastic polymers has become a global problem, leaving no continent and habitat unaffected. Plastic waste is broken down into smaller parts by environmental factors, which generate micro- and nanoplastic particles (MNPPs), ultimately ending up in the human food chain. Before entering the human body, MNPPs make their first contact with saliva in the human mouth. However, it is unknown what proteins attach to plastic particles and whether such protein corona formation is affected by the particle's biophysical properties. To this end, we employed polystyrene MNPPs of two different sizes and three different charges and incubated them individually with saliva donated by healthy human volunteers. Particle zeta potential and size analyses were performed using dynamic light scattering complemented by nanoliquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (nLC/HRMS) to qualitatively and quantitatively reveal the protein soft and hard corona for each particle type. Notably, protein profiles and relative quantities were dictated by plastic particle size and charge, which in turn affected their hydrodynamic size, polydispersity, and zeta potential. Strikingly, we provide evidence of the latter to be dynamic processes depending on exposure times. Smaller particles seemed to be more reactive with the surrounding proteins, and cultures of the particles with five different cell lines (HeLa, HEK293, A549, HepG2, and HaCaT) indicated protein corona effects on cellular metabolic activity and genotoxicity. In summary, our data suggest nanoplastic size and surface chemistry dictate the decoration by human saliva proteins, with important implications for MNPP uptake in humans.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Unravelling protein corona formation on pristine and leached microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that when microplastics encounter proteins in biological fluids, they get coated in a "protein corona" that depends heavily on the plastic's chemical additives, surface area, and how much it has been weathered in the environment. This coating changes how microplastics behave in the body, meaning toxicity studies need to account for these real-world surface changes.

Article Tier 2

From ingestion to transformation: in vitro evidence of nanoplastic alterations by biological fluids

AI summary Read the abstract

When tiny plastic particles (nanoplastics) are exposed to simulated stomach and gut fluids, scientists found they don't stay the same, they clump together and get coated with digestive proteins, changing their size and surface properties. This matters because these transformations could affect whether the particles pass through your gut lining into your body, but more research is needed to know exactly how this impacts health risks.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics fate under pollutant adsorption and corona modulation mapped by cryo-3D-SIM and cryo-SXT

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that tiny plastic particles become more toxic to immune cells when they pick up common pollutants from the environment—but interestingly, when these particles get coated with proteins (similar to what happens naturally in our blood and body fluids), that toxicity drops. This matters because it shows that a plastic particle's danger isn't fixed—it changes based on what it picks up along the way and how our body responds to it, which is important for understanding the real-world health risks of microplastic exposure through breathing and eating.

Article Tier 2

Characteristics of protein corona formation on the surface of micro- and nanoplastics and their effects on cellular uptake and transport

AI summary Read the abstract

When tiny plastic particles get into our bodies, blood proteins quickly coat their surface, and this coating changes how the particles behave. This study found that the plastic's size and electrical charge affect how much protein sticks to it, which in turn influences whether cells absorb the particles and how much damage they might cause. Notably, positively charged plastic particles were more toxic and better at slipping past the body's protective barriers, suggesting that not all microplastics pose equal risk.

Article Tier 2

Cellular internalization pathways of environmentally exposed microplastic particles: Phagocytosis or macropinocytosis?

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how microplastic particles coated with natural biomolecules from freshwater versus saltwater environments are taken up by cells. They found that the protein coatings formed in different water types were chemically distinct and led to different cellular uptake pathways: freshwater-coated particles entered cells mainly through phagocytosis, while saltwater-coated particles used macropinocytosis. The study reveals that where a microplastic particle has been in the environment fundamentally changes how it interacts with living cells.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper