0
Article Tier 2 Sign in to save

A template wizard for the cocreation of machine-readable data-reporting to harmonize the evaluation of (nano)materials

Nature Protocols 2024 15 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers created a user-friendly tool called the Template Wizard that helps scientists record and share their nanomaterial safety data in standardized, machine-readable formats. The tool includes over 60 templates for common experiments in nanosafety research, including toxicity testing. While focused on data management rather than microplastics directly, standardized reporting of nanoplastic safety data is critical for building a reliable evidence base on the health risks of micro- and nanoplastics.

Making research data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) is typically hampered by a lack of skills in technical aspects of data management by data generators and a lack of resources. We developed a Template Wizard for researchers to easily create templates suitable for consistently capturing data and metadata from their experiments. The templates are easy to use and enable the compilation of machine-readable metadata to accompany data generation and align them to existing community standards and databases, such as eNanoMapper, streamlining the adoption of the FAIR principles. These templates are citable objects and are available as online tools. The Template Wizard is designed to be user friendly and facilitates using and reusing existing templates for new projects or project extensions. The wizard is accompanied by an online template validator, which allows self-evaluation of the template (to ensure mapping to the data schema and machine readability of the captured data) and transformation by an open-source parser into machine-readable formats, compliant with the FAIR principles. The templates are based on extensive collective experience in nanosafety data collection and include over 60 harmonized data entry templates for physicochemical characterization and hazard assessment (cell viability, genotoxicity, environmental organism dose-response tests, omics), as well as exposure and release studies. The templates are generalizable across fields and have already been extended and adapted for microplastics and advanced materials research. The harmonized templates improve the reliability of interlaboratory comparisons, data reuse and meta-analyses and can facilitate the safety evaluation and regulation process for (nano) materials.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Screening and prioritization of nano- and microplastic particle toxicity studies for evaluating human health risks – development and application of a toxicity study assessment tool

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a standardized tool to screen and rank toxicity studies on nano- and microplastics by quality and relevance, addressing a critical gap in how scientists evaluate which studies should inform human health risk assessments for these widespread plastic pollutants.

Article Tier 2

Preparing forthe Next Generation of Material EnvironmentalHealth and Safety (EHS) Concerns: Guidelines for Future Data CurationCollaborations

AI summary Read the abstract

This guideline paper calls on the environmental health and safety community to develop standardized data curation frameworks for emerging nanoscale contaminants including micro- and nanoplastics, arguing that consistent, trustworthy datasets are essential for future risk assessment and regulation.

Article Tier 2

Preparing for the Next Generation of Material Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Concerns: Guidelines for Future Data Curation Collaborations

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper presents guidelines for international data curation collaborations in the field of environmental health and safety, addressing emerging contaminants including micro- and nanoplastics. The study outlines nine actionable guidelines structured in scalable phases to help researchers create trustworthy, standardized data for future analyses of advanced materials and environmental contaminants.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Gaps and Pathways Towards Standardized, FAIR Microplastics Data Harmonization: A Systematic Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review examines why microplastic research data is so hard to compare across studies. It finds that a lack of standardized methods for collecting, analyzing, and reporting microplastic data is a major barrier, and proposes a framework for making research more consistent and useful for understanding health risks.

Article Tier 2

Analytical methodologies used for screening micro(nano)plastics in (eco)toxicity tests

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed how scientists analyze microplastics and nanoplastics in toxicity experiments, finding widespread inconsistency in how the particles are characterized before testing — including their size, shape, and chemical makeup. Better standardization of these measurements is essential for comparing results across studies and accurately assessing how microplastics harm living organisms.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper