We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Gaps and Pathways Towards Standardized, FAIR Microplastics Data Harmonization: A Systematic Review
Summary
This systematic review examines why microplastic research data is so hard to compare across studies. It finds that a lack of standardized methods for collecting, analyzing, and reporting microplastic data is a major barrier, and proposes a framework for making research more consistent and useful for understanding health risks.
The global proliferation of plastics and their degradation into microplastics (<5 mm) have created a pervasive environmental crisis with severe ecological and human health consequences. Despite the exponential growth in microplastic research over the past decade, standardized protocols are still lacking. The absence of consistent sampling, analysis, and reporting methods limits data comparability, interoperability, and harmonization across studies. This study conducted a systematic bibliographic review of 355 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2022 that investigated microplastics in freshwater as well as marine water and sediment environments. The goal was to evaluate methodological consistency, sampling instruments, measurement units, reported characteristics, and data-sharing practices to identify pathways toward harmonized and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) microplastic data. Results show that 80.6% of studies focused on marine environments, 18% on freshwater, and 1.4% on both. This highlights persistent data gaps in freshwater systems, which function as key transport pathways for plastics to the ocean. Most studies targeted water (59%) rather than sediment (41%) and were mostly based on single-time sampling, limiting long-term analyses. Surface layers (<1 m) were predominantly sampled, while deeper layers remain understudied. Nets, particularly Manta, neuston, and plankton nets were the dominant tools for water sampling, whereas grabs, corers, and metallic receptacles were used for sediments. However, variations in mesh size and sampling depth introduce substantial biases in particle size recovery and reduce comparability across studies. The most common units were counts/volume for water and counts/g dry weight for sediments, but more than ten unit expressions were identified, complicating conversions. Only 35% of studies reported all four key microplastic characteristics (color, polymer type, shape, and size), and less than 20% made datasets publicly available. To advance harmonization, we recommend the adoption of consistent measurement units, mandatory reporting of key metadata, and wider implementation of open data practices aligned with the FAIR principles. These insights provide a foundation for developing robust monitoring strategies and evidence-based management frameworks. This is especially important for freshwater systems, where data remain scarce, and policy intervention is urgently needed.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A Review of Global Microplastic (MP) Databases: A Study on the Challenges and Opportunities for Data Integration in the Context of MP Pollution
This review examines the challenges and opportunities for integrating global microplastic pollution databases, finding that existing databases operate in isolation with inconsistent reporting standards, and proposes a foundational framework for aggregating and harmonizing heterogeneous MP datasets to enable cross-comparison.
Reporting Marine Microplastics Data: the Need for a Standardized Protocol
This paper argues for standardized protocols for reporting marine microplastic data, noting that inconsistent methods across studies make it impossible to compare results or track pollution trends globally. The authors reviewed existing guidelines and proposed a minimum set of variables that should be reported in all marine microplastic studies. Standardization is urgently needed to enable policy-relevant monitoring of ocean plastic contamination.
Solving the Nonalignment of Methods and Approaches Used in Microplastic Research to Consistently Characterize Risk
Researchers proposed and tested methods to rescale microplastic data collected using different sampling and analysis approaches, addressing the lack of standardization that hampers comparisons across studies. They developed correction factors to account for differences in particle size ranges, sampling volumes, and analytical techniques. The study provides practical tools for harmonizing microplastic research data, which could significantly improve global pollution assessments.
Quantification of microplastics: Which parameters are essential for a reliable inter-study comparison?
Inconsistent measurement methods make it very difficult to compare microplastic data across studies. This paper proposes standardized guidelines for quantifying microplastic size and shape distributions, which would allow scientists to better track pollution levels over time and across locations.
Improving monitoring, analysis and reporting to assess plastic pollution: a matter of comparability
This review examines two decades of microplastic monitoring in aquatic systems, identifying persistent challenges in harmonizing methodologies for sampling, analysis, and reporting that hinder data comparison, and proposing improvements to create comparable datasets for assessing plastic pollution from river basins to the ocean.