We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A systematic review of airborne microplastics emissions as emerging contaminants in outdoor and indoor air environments
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review compared microplastic levels in indoor and outdoor air around the world. Indoor air often contains more microplastics than outdoor air — largely from synthetic clothing and household items — meaning our homes and workplaces may be significant sources of daily microplastic exposure.
Microplastics (MPs), the emerging contaminants of the present century, are potentially a major threat to human health and ecology. There is currently no comparison of the properties of MPs in indoor and outdoor air. Thus, there is a need a systematic review (SR). The goals of this study were to answer the following questions: (1) what are the geographical distribution, sources, abundances, and characteristics (polymer, type, shape, color, size) of MPs in outdoor and indoor air? (2) What are the limitations of the published studies and recommendations for future research? To achieve these objectives, four electronic databases were searched to find works published before December 31, 2022. In total, 37 publications were selected based on the PRISMA guidelines. The study found that polyester and polyethylene terephthalate were the most dominant polymer types in outdoor and indoor environments, respectively. The most important indoor sources for MPs included synthetic textiles, kitchen plastic utensils, synthetic fiber carpets, detergents, and furniture, while the most important sources for outdoor MPs include industrial emissions, particulate emissions from vehicles, burning of plastic waste, the expulsion of air bubbles and wave action in ocean and decomposition and destruction of plastic materials. Fibers were the dominant shape of airborne MPs in both environments. The predominant colors of the MPs in samples of the indoor air were white and transparent, whereas black was most abundant in the microplastic samples collected from the air outside the building. Finally, given the ubiquitous nature of MPs and their potential for adverse effects, governments should take effective measures to reduce the production of plastic materials and finally increase plastics reuse, and recycling rate.
More Papers Like This
First overview of microplastics in indoor and outdoor air
AI summary Read the abstract
This study provided one of the first comprehensive overviews of microplastic contamination in both indoor and outdoor air, establishing that microplastics are airborne and that indoor environments may have higher concentrations than outdoors due to synthetic materials and textiles. The findings raised new concerns about inhalation as a pathway for human microplastic exposure.
Systematic review of microplastics and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor air: identifying a framework and data needs for quantifying human inhalation exposures
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic review is the first to examine microplastic levels in both indoor and outdoor air and estimate how much people inhale. The findings suggest we are breathing in microplastic particles daily, with indoor air often containing higher concentrations due to synthetic textiles and household materials.
Microplastics Aloft: A comprehensive exploration of sources, transport, variations, interactions and their implications on human health in the atmospheric realm
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes research on airborne microplastics and finds that indoor environments typically contain far more microplastic particles than outdoor air -- up to 760,000 particles per square meter per day indoors versus a maximum of about 1,159 outdoors. Sources include synthetic clothing, plastic manufacturing, and even ocean spray. Inhaled microplastics can reach deep into the lungs and potentially enter the bloodstream, raising concerns about respiratory and cardiovascular health effects.
Occurrence of Microplastics in the Atmosphere: An Overview on Sources, Analytical Challenges, and Human Health Effects
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines microplastic pollution in the atmosphere, covering both indoor and outdoor sources and the challenges of measuring airborne particles. Researchers found that indoor environments, where people spend most of their time, can have particularly high concentrations of microplastics from synthetic textiles and household items. The study highlights that inhaling airborne microplastics is an important but under-studied route of human exposure.
Airborne microplastics: Occurrence, sources, fate, risks and mitigation
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compiles findings from over 140 studies on airborne microplastics, covering their sources, distribution, and health risks in both indoor and outdoor environments. Researchers found that indoor environments often have higher microplastic concentrations than outdoor air, with textiles and building materials being major sources. The study highlights growing evidence that inhaled microplastics may pose respiratory health risks and calls for standardized measurement methods.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.