0
Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Risk assessment of natural and synthetic fibers in aquatic environment: A critical review

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Luisa Albarano, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Luisa Albarano, Chiara Maggio, Luisa Albarano, Chiara Maggio, Giovanni Libralato, Vincenzo Vaiano, Giovanni Libralato, Annamaria La Marca, Annamaria La Marca, Giovanni Libralato, Luisa Albarano, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Rosalba Iovine, Giusy Lofrano, Rosalba Iovine, Marco Guida Giusy Lofrano, Giusy Lofrano, Vincenzo Romano Spica, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Marco Guida Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Marco Guida Giovanni Libralato, Marco Guida Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Vincenzo Vaiano, Luisa Albarano, Marco Guida Giovanni Libralato, Maurizio Carotenuto, Giovanni Libralato, Silvana Pedatella, Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Vincenzo Romano Spica, Marco Guida Giovanni Libralato, Marco Guida Marco Guida Marco Guida Giovanni Libralato, Giovanni Libralato, Marco Guida

Summary

This review assessed the ecological risks of both natural and synthetic fibers in aquatic environments, finding that nylon fibers pose the highest toxicity risk. Mollusks like mussels and oysters were the most sensitive organisms to fiber exposure. Since these shellfish are widely consumed by humans, fiber pollution in the ocean could affect seafood safety and ultimately human health.

Study Type Environmental

Marine microplastics, categorized as primary and secondary, including synthetic microfibers like polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP) and acrylic (PC), represent a potential environmental concern. The complex classification of these fibers, originating from diverse sources such as textiles and many others commercial goods, prompts a need for understanding their impact on aquatic organisms. This study assesses the ecological risks associated with both natural and synthetic fibers in aquatic ecosystems, focusing on toxicity data and their effects on taxonomic groups like Mollusca, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Cnidaria, and Chordata. To carry out species sensitivity distribution (SSD) curves, a comprehensive analysis of scientific literature was conducted, collecting toxicity data related to various fibers. The resulting SSDs provide insights into the relative sensitivity of different taxonomic groups. The potential ecological risks were evaluated by comparing measured concentrations in diverse aquatic environments with Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC) values. The calculation of Risk Quotient (RQ) allowed to indicate areas where fibers abundance poses a potential threat to aquatic organisms. The study reveals that nylon fibers can pose the highest toxicity risk, especially in Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, Arabian Gulf and VietNam river. Mollusca emerged as particularly sensitive to different fiber types, likely due to their body structure facilitating the accumulation of microfibers. The research emphasizes the urgent need for further studies to get data to human health risk analysis and to address comprehensive environmental management strategies to address the global issue of microfiber pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper