0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Strategies for the quantification and characterization of nanoplastics in AOPs research

Chemical Engineering Journal 2024 17 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Carla di Luca, Jorge García, Macarena Muñoz, Mercedes Hernando‐Pérez, Zahara M. de Pedro, José A. Casas

Summary

This study evaluated different laboratory methods for measuring how well water treatment processes break down nanoplastics. The researchers tested techniques including electron microscopy, light scattering, and chemical analysis to track changes in nanoplastic particles during treatment. Having reliable ways to measure nanoplastic removal is critical for developing water treatment methods that can protect drinking water from this emerging contaminant.

Polymers

There is a growing interest in developing new targeted degradation technologies for the removal of micro- and nanoplastics (NPs) in water, corresponding to increased public concerns regarding their potential negative impacts on urban water systems, and consequently on human life quality. Recently, Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) have been proposed as promising treatment alternatives for effective degradation of NPs in water. However, the selection of appropriate analytical methods for monitoring these oxidation tests remains a challenge. Herein, the feasibility of different characterization strategies for monitoring the evolution of NPs in water upon oxidation tests was systematically studied using polystyrene (PS) NPs of different particle sizes (D0 = 140, 252, 460, and 909 nm) as model plastic pollutants. To quantify NPs in water, Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and turbidity measurements were assessed. Moreover, turbidity was correlated to the particle size and PS NPs concentration by developing a response surface. Among the analytical techniques employed to characterize the solid particles, transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) was used to evaluate morphology and particle size. Alternatively, the viability of Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) to determine particle size is discussed. Chemical surface modifications were explored by Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). As a proof of concept, the degradation of PS NPs in water upon photo-Fenton oxidation was investigated at ambient conditions and fully characterized using the mentioned techniques.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Removal of nanoplastics in water treatment processes: A review

This review examines technologies for removing nanoplastics from water, noting that conventional treatment processes effective for larger plastics often fail to capture these tiny particles. Researchers evaluated emerging methods including microbial degradation, membrane filtration, and photocatalysis, finding that combined approaches offer the best removal rates. The study highlights that more research is needed to develop practical, large-scale solutions for nanoplastic contamination in drinking water and wastewater.

Article Tier 2

Nano/microplastics in water and wastewater treatment processes – Origin, impact and potential solutions

This review examined the origin, fate, and impacts of nano- and microplastics in water and wastewater treatment processes, finding that small particle sizes and diverse polymer compositions make complete removal challenging across conventional and advanced treatment stages. The authors identify detection limitations and process instability as key barriers to effective water treatment for nanoplastics.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence, Fate, and Treatment of Micro/Nano Plastics in Drinking Water Sources

This review examines the occurrence, fate, and treatment of micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water sources, covering how these particles enter water supplies and what treatment technologies exist to remove them. The authors note significant gaps in both detection methods and removal efficiency.

Review Tier 2

Removal of microplastics and nanoplastics in water treatment processes: A systematic literature review

Researchers systematically reviewed 103 studies across 26 water treatment plants in 12 countries to assess how well various technologies remove microplastics and nanoplastics from drinking water, finding that while coagulation, filtration, and advanced treatments help, significant gaps remain. The review identifies that no single process achieves complete removal, leaving microplastics as a persistent contaminant in treated water supplies.

Article Tier 2

Treatment processes for microplastics and nanoplastics in waters: State-of-the-art review

This review summarized established and emerging treatment processes for removing microplastics and nanoplastics from drinking water and wastewater, evaluating coagulation, membrane filtration, advanced oxidation, and biological treatment in terms of removal efficiency and operational feasibility.

Share this paper