0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in Arctic waters of the Finnish Sámi area

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Tuomo Soininen, Emilia Uurasjärvi, Lauri Hämäläinen, Noora Huusari, Juha Feodoroff, Jouko Moshnikoff, Eetu Niiranen, Pauliina Feodoroff, Tero Mustonen, Arto Koistinen, Arto Koistinen

Summary

A study combining Indigenous ecological knowledge and field sampling found microplastics in Arctic freshwater ecosystems in the Finnish Sami region, with small particles and fibers detected even in remote wilderness waters.

Study Type Environmental

We explored the presence of microplastics in the Finnish Arctic Sámi home area. A dialogue between Indigenous knowledge and scientific field work produced data about microplastics in remote wilderness aquatic ecosystems. Methods included geographical Indigenous knowledge analysis, water sampling with fraction filtration, and imaging Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The MPs found were small; the mean particle size was 126 ± 121 μm. Particle concentrations of MPs in freshwater and marine samples varied between 45 and 423 MPs m−3 and the most common polymer types were polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyethylene terephthalate. In conclusion, because microplastics are present even in the wilderness areas, their abundance should be monitored to assess plastic pollution in the relatively pristine Arctic environments. Sámi Indigenous knowledge proved to be a beneficial and important initiator, because locals recognize the possible sources and transport pathways of plastic litter, and practical sampling sites in the complex freshwater systems of the area.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Data for article: Microplastics in Arctic Waters of the Finnish Sámi Area

This is the dataset for a study measuring microplastics in Arctic waters of the Finnish Sámi area in Lapland. The data include sampling coordinates, volumes, and particle counts from an Indigenous region that is increasingly affected by plastic pollution despite its remote location.

Article Tier 2

Presence of nanoplastics in rural and remote surface waters

Researchers detected nanoplastics in surface waters at two contrasting sites—remote Siberian Arctic tundra and Swedish forests—confirming that nanoplastic contamination extends to rural and remote freshwater environments far from urban pollution sources.

Article Tier 2

First evidence of microplastic occurrence in the marine and freshwater environments in a remote polar region of the Kola Peninsula and a correlation with human presence

Researchers documented the first evidence of microplastic contamination — both fibers and fragments — in the marine waters of the Barents Sea and remote freshwater lakes of the Kola Peninsula, with levels correlating to the degree of local human activity.

Article Tier 2

Data for article: Microplastics in Arctic Waters of the Finnish Sámi Area

This is an earlier version of the dataset for the Arctic microplastics study in the Finnish Sámi area. The data document plastic particle presence in remote northern waters, providing baseline information for monitoring pollution trends in this ecologically sensitive region.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in the Arctic: A case study with sub-surface water and fish samples off Northeast Greenland

Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in sub-surface water and two mid-trophic level fish species off Northeast Greenland, finding synthetic particles in both water samples and fish stomachs. The study demonstrates that even remote Arctic ecosystems are not free from microplastic pollution, with fibers being the most commonly detected particle type.

Share this paper