0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Microplastic Analysis in Soil Using Ultra-High-Resolution UV–Vis–NIR Spectroscopy and Chemometric Modeling

Microplastics 2024 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lori Shelton Pieniazek, Lori Shelton Pieniazek, Michael L. McKinney, Jake A. Carr, Michael L. McKinney, Jake A. Carr Michael L. McKinney, Michael L. McKinney, Michael L. McKinney, Jake A. Carr, Jake A. Carr Michael L. McKinney, Lei Shen, Jake A. Carr, Jake A. Carr

Summary

Researchers tested a new method using UV-visible-near infrared spectroscopy combined with machine learning to identify microplastics in soil samples. They found the technique could rapidly and accurately distinguish between different plastic polymers and natural soil particles. The study offers a promising alternative to current labor-intensive identification methods, potentially making large-scale microplastic soil monitoring more practical.

The study of microplastics (MPs) in soils is impeded by similarities between plastic and non-plastic particles and the misidentification of MP by current analytical methods such as visual microscopic examination. Soil MPs pose serious ecological and public health risks because of their abundance, persistence, and ubiquity. Thus, reliable identification methods are badly needed for scientific study. One possible solution is UV–Vis–NIR spectroscopy, which has the ability to rapidly identify and quantify concentrations of soil microplastics. In this study, a full-range, field portable spectrometer (350–2500 nm) with ultra-high spectral resolution (1.5 nm, 3.0 nm, and 3.8 nm) identified three types of common plastics: low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polypropylene (PP). Three sets of artificially MP-treated vermiculite soil samples were prepared for model prediction testing and validation: 150 samples for model calibration and 50 samples for model validation. A partial least square regression model using the spectral signatures for quantification of soil and MP mixtures was built with all three plastic polymers. Prediction R2 values of all three polymers showed promising results: polypropylene R2 = 0.943, polyvinyl chloride R2 = 0.983, and polyethylene R2 = 0.957. Our study supports previous work showing that combining ultra-high-resolution UV–Vis–NIR spectrometry with quantitative modeling can improve the accuracy and speed of MP identification and quantification in soil.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper