Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Mass Concentration and Removal Characteristics of Microplastics and Nanoplastics in a Drinking Water Treatment Plant

ACS ES&T Water 2024 29 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Yanghui Xu, Yanghui Xu, Qin Ou, Yanghui Xu, Qin Ou, Yanghui Xu, Yanghui Xu, Yanghui Xu, Yanghui Xu, Xintu Wang, Qin Ou, Yanghui Xu, Qin Ou, Xintu Wang, Yanghui Xu, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Yanghui Xu, Yanghui Xu, Yanghui Xu, Xintu Wang, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Xintu Wang, Qin Ou, Qin Ou, Xintu Wang, Xintu Wang, Xintu Wang, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Gang Liu Qin Ou, Xintu Wang, Gang Liu Xintu Wang, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Xintu Wang, Qin Ou, Xintu Wang, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Gang Liu Xintu Wang, Gang Liu Gang Liu Jan Peter van der Hoek, Yanghui Xu, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Jan Peter van der Hoek, Gang Liu Gang Liu Jan Peter van der Hoek, Gang Liu Gang Liu Gang Liu Gang Liu Gang Liu Jan Peter van der Hoek, Gang Liu

Summary

Researchers measured both microplastics and nanoplastics by mass throughout an entire drinking water treatment plant, finding that raw water contained about 9.6 micrograms per liter of plastic polymers. Treatment reduced this by roughly 92%, but nanoplastics and very small microplastics were harder to remove than larger particles. The study highlights the importance of measuring plastic contamination by mass, not just by particle count, for a more accurate picture of exposure through drinking water.

Polymers

PE PET PP

Study Type Environmental

The occurrence and removal of microplastics (MPs) in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) have been evaluated based on particle number, while the mass concentration and removal characteristics based on the mass of MPs, and especially nanoplastics (NPs), remain unknown. This study employed pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) to determine the mass concentration of MPs and NPs with different size ranges (0.01–1, 1–50, and 50–1000 μm) across the entire treatment process in a DWTP. The total polymers were measured at 9.63 ± 1.52 μg/L in raw water and 0.77 ± 0.05 μg/L in treated water, with the dominant polymers being polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate. NPs (0.01–1 μm) accounted for only 3.2–5.3% of the total polymers, with an average concentration of 0.38 μg/L in raw water and 0.04 μg/L in treated water. Notably, NPs and sub-MPs (1–50 μm) demonstrated relatively low efficiency in the DWTP at 88.9 ± 3.2 and 88.0 ± 2.5%, respectively, compared with that of the large MPs (50–1000 μm) at 92.9 ± 0.3%. Overall, this study examined the occurrence of MPs and NPs, in a DWTP, emphasizing the significance of considering the mass concentration of MPs and NPs when assessing their pollution levels and removal characteristics.

Read via DOI Download PDF

Share this paper

Post Share Share Pin Email