We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics in soil affect the growth and physiological characteristics of Chinese fir and Phoebe bournei seedlings
Summary
Pot experiments with tree seedlings showed that high concentrations of polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics in soil suppressed plant growth by reducing chlorophyll levels, weakening antioxidant defenses, and lowering key nutrients in leaves. Lower concentrations of polyethylene actually had some positive effects, suggesting the impacts depend on dose and plastic type. These findings are relevant to understanding how microplastic-contaminated soils could affect forestry and reforestation efforts.
Pot experiments were conducted using Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.) and Phoebe bournei (Hemsl.) Yang) to investigate whether soil microplastics adversely affect the nurturing and renewal of plantations. Microplastics composed of polyethylene and polypropylene with a size of 48 μm were used. The treatments included a control group (without microplastics) and groups treated with microplastic concentrations of 1% and 2% (w/w). The effects of microplastics on the growth, photosynthetic pigments in leaves, antioxidant systems, and osmotic regulation substances of the seedlings were analysed by measuring the seedling height, ground-line diameter growth, chlorophyll (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll) contents, antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase) activities, and malondialdehyde, soluble sugar, and soluble protein levels. The results indicated that treatment with 1% polyethylene microplastics increased the chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll, and soluble protein contents in the leaves of both types of seedlings while inhibiting superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities in P. bournei seedlings. Treatment with 2% polyethylene or polypropylene microplastics suppressed the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll contents; superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase activities; and soluble sugar and soluble protein levels in the leaves of both types of seedlings, resulting in reduced growth in terms of height and ground-line diameter. The physiological effects of polyethylene microplastics were more evident than those of polypropylene at the same concentration. The results demonstrated that microplastics can affect photosynthesis, the antioxidant system, and osmotic regulation in Chinese fir and P. bournei seedlings, thereby inhibiting their normal growth and development. Exposure to 1% (w/w) microplastics triggered stress responses in seedlings, whereas 2% (w/w) microplastics impeded seedling growth.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Effects of Microplastics on Growth Pattern of Pinus massoniana and Schima uperba
Researchers exposed two economically important tree species (Pinus massoniana and Schima superba) to microplastics and found species-specific differences in how woody plants respond to plastic contamination, with effects on growth, photosynthesis, and oxidative stress.
Microplastic-induced alterations in growth and microecology of mulberry seedlings: Implications for sustainable forest–soil systems
This study found that polyethylene and polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics have very different effects on mulberry tree growth and soil microbes. Polyethylene actually stimulated tree growth and boosted soil nitrogen-cycling bacteria, while PLA reduced plant biomass and disrupted soil fungal communities important for nutrient uptake. The contrasting results show that different types of microplastics can have opposite effects on plant-soil systems, complicating predictions about their environmental impact.
Effects of Microplastics on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Mulberry
Researchers exposed mulberry trees to varying concentrations of polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics in soil, finding that high concentrations (10% by weight) significantly reduced plant growth and damaged the photosynthetic system while triggering oxidative stress — a type of cellular damage from harmful reactive molecules. The findings show that even biodegradable plastics can harm economically important trees when they accumulate in soil at high levels.
Impact of various microplastics on the morphological characteristics and nutrition of the young generation of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)
Researchers examined the effects of various microplastic types on plant morphological characteristics and nutrient uptake, finding that polymer type and concentration differentially impair root growth, leaf development, and mineral absorption.
Uptake and physiological impacts of nanoplastics in trees with divergent water use strategies
Researchers studied how nanoplastics are taken up by tree roots and whether this uptake affects tree health and function. They found that trees did absorb nanoplastics through their root systems, and the particles caused oxidative stress and reduced photosynthetic capacity. The study suggests that plastic pollution in soil could impair the functioning of trees, which play a critical role in carbon sequestration and ecosystem health.