0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics in maize-soil ecosystems: Above and below ground

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 31 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ziqiang Liu, Hui Wei, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Zhenhua Wu, Zhijun Su, Zhijun Su, Jiahao Wen, Jiahao Wen, Zhenhua Wu, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Yirui Zhang, Hui Wei, Jiahao Wen, Jiaen Zhang Ziqiang Liu, Zhijun Su, Zhijun Su, Jiaen Zhang Ziqiang Liu, Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Zhijun Su, Zhenhua Wu, Zhijun Su, Hui Wei, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Ziqiang Liu, Hui Wei, Jiaen Zhang Hui Wei, Hui Wei, Hui Wei, Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Jiaen Zhang Ziqiang Liu, Hui Wei, Hui Wei, Jiaen Zhang Hui Wei, Jiaen Zhang

Summary

Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene and polypropylene) and biodegradable plastics (PBAT and PCL) on corn plants and soil health. One biodegradable plastic, PCL, reduced plant production by about 74% and severely disrupted soil enzyme activity and microbial communities. This study cautions that simply replacing conventional plastics with biodegradable alternatives in farming is not guaranteed to be safer for soil ecosystems.

Polymers

The increasing accumulation of microplastics (MPs) in agroecosystems has raised significant environmental and public health concerns, facilitating the application of biodegradable plastics. However, the comparative effects of conventional and biodegradable MPs in agroecosystem are still far from fully understood. Here we developed microcosm experiments to reveal the ecological effects of conventional (polyethylene [PE] and polypropylene [PP]) and biodegradable (polyadipate/butylene terephthalate [PBAT] and polycaprolactone [PCL]) MPs (0, 1%, 5%; w/w) in the maize-soil ecosystem. We found that PCL MPs reduced plant production by 73.6-75.2%, while PE, PP and PBAT MPs elicited almost negligible change. The addition of PCL MPs decreased specific enzyme activities critical for soil nutrients cycling by 71.5-95.3%. Biodegradable MPs tended to reduce bacterial α-diversity. The 1% treatments of PE and PBAT, and PCL enhanced bacterial networks complexity, whereas 5% of PE and PBAT, and PP had adverse effect. Moreover, biodegradable MPs appeared to reduce the α-diversity and networks complexity of fungal community. Overall, PCL reduced the ecosystem multifunctionality, mainly by inhibiting the microbial metabolic activity. This study offers evidence that biodegradable MPs can impair agroecosystem multifunctionality, and highlights the potential risks to replace the conventional plastics by biodegradable ones in agricultural practices.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper