We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Transitioning to Microplastic-Free Seed Coatings: Challenges and Solutions
AI summary Read the abstract
This review addresses the challenge of transitioning agricultural seed coatings away from manufactured microplastics in response to emerging regulations. Researchers examined current seed coating formulations that rely on synthetic polymer binders and identified promising alternatives including biopolymers, natural waxes, and mineral-based coatings. The study highlights that any replacement must maintain seed performance characteristics such as flowability and protection while meeting new environmental standards.
This review addresses the issue of replacing manufactured microplastics in seed coatings used in agriculture. Firstly, it focuses on the policy and regulatory actions taken on microplastics at a global level. There is no consensus within the scientific community on the definition of a microplastic and, more generally, on the classification of plastic debris. Nevertheless, several decision schemes have been proposed in an attempt to define the notion of microplastics. The different criteria relevant to this definition, such as the size, physical state, chemical structure, origin, and persistence of microplastics, are discussed, with a comparison being made between the REACH regulation and the scientific literature. Seed production and processing are also discussed, with the functions of seed coatings being explained in order to gain a better understanding of the properties to be considered in a substitution strategy for currently used microplastics. The main challenges are multiple; substitutes must provide the same performance as microplastics: (i) improving the adherence of the treatment to the seed, (ii) distributing the treatment more evenly over the seed, (iii) reducing the amount of dust-off when handling treated seed, and (iv) improving the seed flowability, which is particularly important during the sowing stage, all while preserving the physiological properties of the seed. Substitute polymers are proposed according to the desired performance and functional properties: two main chemical families of biopolymers were identified in the literature: polysaccharides and proteins. Among them, 13 and 6 polymers, respectively, complied with REACH regulation, demonstrating adhesion, dust reduction performances, and preservation of seed physiological quality in particular. This work aims to guide future studies on microplastic substitution in seed coatings, and to highlight research needs in this area. It is based on an analysis and discussion of the literature, identifying and listing potential substitutes.
More Papers Like This
Architecting seed resilience: a safe-by-design and microplastic-free nanoenabled framework for advanced seed priming and sustainable agriculture
AI summary Read the abstract
This review paper examines seed coating methods that avoid plastic based materials, which are currently used to protect seeds but contribute to microplastic pollution. It summarizes research on plant based alternatives, such as fibers, carriers and extracts, and identifies gaps in testing and rules needed before wider use.
Advancements and challenges in controlled-release fertilisers: An approach to integrate biopolymer-based strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines controlled-release fertilizers, which are designed to deliver nutrients to plants gradually, and finds that many use synthetic polymer coatings that can leave microplastic residues in soil. The authors highlight biopolymers made from natural materials like chitosan, cellulose, and starch as promising alternatives that can biodegrade without contributing to plastic pollution. The shift toward biodegradable fertilizer coatings could help reduce a significant but often overlooked source of agricultural microplastic contamination.
Using Static Multiple Light Scattering to Develop Microplastic-Free Seed Film-Coating Formulations
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used Static Multiple Light Scattering (SMLS) technology to evaluate microplastic-free substitutes -- including maltodextrin, methylcellulose, gums, PVA, and ethoxylated rapeseed oil -- for use in seed film-coating formulations, measuring how each affects coating stability. The study identifies formulation conditions that maintain coating performance without synthetic microplastic components.
Engineering biodegradable coatings for sustainable fertilisers
AI summary Read the abstract
This review explored engineering biodegradable coatings for controlled-release fertilizers as sustainable alternatives to conventional plastic-coated products, addressing concerns about microplastic contamination from agricultural plastic films while maintaining effective nutrient delivery to crops.
Biodegradable Alternatives to Synthetic Polymer Coatings in the Production of Controlled-Release Fertilizers
AI summary Read the abstract
Many fertilizers used today are coated in plastic to slowly release nutrients into soil, but that plastic doesn't fully break down—it builds up in farmland as microplastics that can eventually make their way into our food and water. This review paper looks at plant-based alternatives (made from things like starches, plant fibers, and biodegradable plastics) that could do the same job of slow-release feeding without leaving lasting plastic residue behind. The research suggests these greener coatings show real promise, though scientists still need to test how well they hold up in real farm conditions before they can replace plastic coatings at a large scale.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.