0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Multigenerational toxicity of microplastics derived from two types of agricultural mulching films to Folsomia candida

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 19 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested whether microplastics from agricultural plastic mulch films affected springtail reproduction over five generations. Surprisingly, neither biodegradable nor conventional plastic microplastics caused significant harm to survival or reproduction at environmentally relevant levels. While reassuring for soil invertebrates, the study only looked at one species, and other organisms may respond differently to these common agricultural contaminants.

Degradation and fragmentation of mulching films represents an increasing source of microplastics (MPs, plastic particles 1 μm to 5 mm in size) to agricultural soils. MPs have been shown to affect many soil invertebrates, including springtails. However, these studies typically use test materials representing less environmentally relevant particle types, such as pristine uniform MPs, which do not represent the large range of particle sizes and morphologies found in the field. This study aimed at providing insight into the adverse effects of MPs originating from agricultural mulching films, by using artificially aged MPs derived from both biodegradable (starch-polybutadiene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)) blend, as well as conventional (linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE)) plastic polymers. The soil dwelling springtail Folsomia candida was exposed to these MPs for five generations in order to elucidate population effects due to possible reproduction toxicity, endocrine disruption, mutagenesis or developmental toxicity. F. candida were exposed to 0, 0.0016, 0.008, 0.04, 0.2, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 % (w/w dry soil) MPs in Lufa 2.2 soil, which includes concentrations within the range of environmental relevance. Juveniles produced at each concentration were transferred to the next generation, with the parental, F2 and F4 generations being exposed for four weeks and F1 and F3 generations for five weeks. No concentration-dependent effects on F. candida survival or reproduction were observed in exposures to either of the MPs, in any of the generations. These results suggest that the particular MPs used in this study, derived from mulching films used on agricultural soils, may not be potent toxicants to F. candida, even after long-term exposure and at elevated concentrations.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Survival and reproduction effects of microplastics from three agricultural mulching films on Folsomia candida, Sinella curviseta, Heteromurus nitidus and Ceratophysella denticulata (Collembola)

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists tested whether microplastics from three types of agricultural plastic films affect the survival and reproduction of four species of springtails, tiny soil-dwelling arthropods. Across all plastic types, including biodegradable starch-blend films and conventional polyethylene, no dose-dependent harmful effects were observed even at the highest concentrations tested. The results suggest that these agricultural microplastics may pose limited direct toxicity risk to springtail populations in soil.

Article Tier 2

Different mulch films, consistent results: soil fauna responses to microplastic

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PLA/PBAT microplastics affect earthworms and springtails in soil over 28 days. Neither plastic type significantly harmed reproduction, but subtle cellular stress responses were detected, and the effects were similar for both conventional and biodegradable plastics, suggesting that biodegradable alternatives may not be safer for soil organisms.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics originated from agricultural mulching films affect enchytraeid multigeneration reproduction and soil properties

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested microplastics from real agricultural mulching films, both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable types, on small soil worms over multiple generations. Even biodegradable film microplastics reduced worm reproduction and altered soil properties like pH and water-holding capacity. The results show that microplastics from agricultural plastics, including supposedly eco-friendly alternatives, can harm soil organisms and threaten long-term soil health and food production.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics from biodegradable mulching films affect soil physicochemical properties and earthworm reproduction, but not microarthropod communities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied the long-term effects of biodegradable mulching film microplastics on soil properties and soil organisms in a 13-week controlled mesocosm experiment. The study found that even the lowest concentration of microplastics (0.025%) significantly altered soil pH and aggregate structure, and higher concentrations reduced earthworm reproduction. However, springtail communities were not affected, suggesting different soil organisms have varying sensitivity to biodegradable microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics from biodegradable mulching films affect soil physicochemical properties and earthworm reproduction, but not microarthropod communities

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a 13-week mesocosm study examining the effects of biodegradable mulching film microplastics on soil properties and invertebrate communities. They found that even low concentrations (0.025%) significantly altered soil pH and aggregate structure, and earthworm reproduction was reduced at higher concentrations, while springtail communities showed no measurable differences between treatments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper