We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Human health risk assessment of nanoparticles through food consumption — occurrence, exposure, and toxicological implications
Summary
This review examined the health risks of nanoparticles found in food and drinking water, analyzing 262 studies from 2016 to 2025. Researchers found that the most commonly reported nanoparticles in food included titanium dioxide, silver, zinc oxide, and micro/nanoplastics, entering through food contact materials, nano-enabled agricultural inputs, and environmental contamination. Evidence consistently pointed to oxidative stress, inflammation, and potential genotoxic effects from dietary nanoparticle exposure.
Nanotechnology is increasingly embedded in agri-food systems through nano-enabled inputs, processing aids, and smart packaging, raising concerns about dietary exposure and human health. A structured Scopus search (2016-2025) identified 669 records on nanoparticles (NPs) in food and drinking water, of which 262 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently reported NPs were TiO₂, Ag, ZnO and nano/microplastics, followed by SiO₂, CuO, CeO₂, nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI), Fe₂O₃, Ni, and graphene. Entry routes into the food chain were intentional use in foods and supplements, migration from food-contact materials, and environmental transfer into raw materials and commodities. Evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies consistently showed oxidative stress, inflammation, genotoxic signalling and epithelial-barrier alterations, with oral exposure in animals linked to hepatic, gastrointestinal, developmental, reproductive and neurobehavioral effects. Risk characterisation applied indices such as Estimated Daily Intake (EDI), Daily Intake of Metals (DIM), Hazard Quotient (HQ), Hazard Index (HI), Margin of Exposure (MOE), Benchmark Dose Lower confidence limit (BMDL)-based methods and Cancer Risk (CR), often combined with probabilistic Monte-Carlo modelling and nano-specific adjustments including ion-equivalent or bioaccessibility-corrected doses, in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic or Toxicokinetic (PBPK/PBTK) models. Methodological gaps persist, notably a limited number-based EDI for NP entities, reliance on total element measurements, mismatched dose metrics between exposure and hazard Points-of-Departure (PoDs), and the lack of chronic, low-dose oral studies suitable for BMD modelling. Regulatory contrasts underline these challenges: E171 (food-grade TiO₂) is no longer considered safe in the European Union due to unresolved genotoxicity, while synthetic amorphous silica (E551) remains of no safety concern, supported by an oral NOAEL of ~1000 mg kg bw day. To guide decision-making, a tiered oral-exposure framework is proposed that aligns dose metrics, standardises nano-characterisation using spICP-MS and AF4-ICP-MS, integrates INFOGEST-based bioaccessibility testing, and ensures transparent reporting of uncertainty and sensitivity.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Toxicity of metal-based nanoparticles: Challenges in the nano era
This review covers the toxic effects of metal-based nanoparticles on human health, including how they cause oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage, and organ dysfunction. While focused on engineered nanoparticles rather than microplastics directly, the toxicity pathways described overlap significantly with those triggered by nanoplastic exposure. Understanding these shared mechanisms helps explain how nano-scale particles of any kind, including nanoplastics, may harm the body.
Potential risk assessment and toxicological impacts of nano/micro-plastics on human health through food products
This review examined the potential risks and toxicological effects of nano- and microplastics on human health through food products, identifying key contamination sources in the food chain and their harmful impacts on the body.
A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota
This systematic review of 68 studies found moderate evidence that zinc-based, copper-based, and silver nanomaterials cause gut microbiota dysbiosis, while titanium dioxide nanoparticles showed variable effects depending on crystal form and dose. The gut microbiome's response to nanomaterials depended heavily on particle composition, size, dose, and exposure duration. These findings are directly relevant to microplastic research, as ingested micro- and nanoplastics similarly interact with gut bacteria and may alter the microbiome composition that influences immune function and overall health.
Nanoparticles in food: formation during cooking, migration from packaging, and nanoplastics release—food safety implications
This review examines how nanoparticles form in food during cooking, migrate from packaging materials, and are released as nanoplastics during food preparation. Researchers found that high-temperature cooking generates fluorescent carbon nanoparticles, while nanosilver transfers from packaging into food at rates that increase with temperature and storage time. The study highlights the need for standardized methods and long-term exposure research to fully understand the health implications of nanoparticles in our food supply.
Microplastic and nanoplastic transfer, accumulation, and toxicity in humans
Researchers reviewed human exposure routes to micro- and nanoplastics — via air, water, and food — and summarized reported toxicological outcomes, identifying ingestion and inhalation as primary entry points and flagging oxidative stress, inflammation, and endocrine disruption as key health concerns warranting further study.